UPA’s Cash

Subsidy

Transfer Scheme

Official Cash Bribe for Vote Scam

By V. SUNDARAM I.A.S
ALL INDIA GENERAL SECRETARY (IDEOLOGY), JANATA PARTY.

Sonia Gandhi                     Rahul Gandhi

NO RELATIONS OF MAHATMA GANDHI!

Rahul Gandhi has the stupid temerity and timorous stupidity to declare that his only Guru in the world of politics is Mahatma Gandhi. This unsurpassed brilliant political genius made this “historic announcement” in an election speech in Gujarat recently. After making this silly declaration, this ever-shifting and ever-shuffling bipolar “Youth Icon” (so avowed openly with aplomb by both Dr Manmohan Singh and Shri Digvijay Singh) has made another great declaration two days ago at a meeting of 51 DCC Presidents in New Delhi. At this meeting, Rahul Gandhi in his capacity as Sonia Congress General Secretary has announced that the Cash Transfer Scheme of the UPA Government to the Aam Admi would ensure a spectacular victory of his Sonia Congress Party in the next two Lok Sabha General elections to be held in 2014 and 2019!

Having played his own murky and none too honourable political role behind the curtains in all the Sonia scams like the Commonwealth Games Scam, 2G Spectrum Scam, Coalgate Scam, Young Indian Scam etc., Rahul Gandhi has now come out into the open and declared unabashedly and shamelessly that he will purchase the voters with cash from the Treasury in the 2014 Lok Sabha Elections by adroitly using the CASH SUBSIDY TRANSFER SCHEME.

If only such a statement had been made by Shri Narendra Modi, Chief Minister of Gujarat or any other non-Congress Chief Minister, the Election Commission of India (ECI) would have swung into action with great alacrity and expedition. The ECI would have disqualified them from contesting in any Parliamentary / Assembly elections for the next 60 years or till the life time of Sonia Gandhi or Rahul Gandhi or the Election Commissioners, WHICHEVER IS LATER!

In order to smoothen the way for the effective procurement of voters in the 2014 Lok Sabha Elections, Sonia Gandhi, drawing her inspiration from her Mother-in-Law, the dictatorial Indira Gandhi, may perhaps take action on a war footing (including the possible declaration of a National Emergency as was done in 1976) to suitably amend the Representation of People Act and the concerned Articles of the Constitution relating to Lok Sabha / State Assembly Elections making purchase of votes through cash a trivial Civil Offence whose adjudication can be dragged indefinitely in all our Courts of Law at all levels.

On the face of it the Cash Subsidy Transfer Scheme is a Mohammad bin Tughlaq type scheme of Sonia Gandhi and her scheming advisor P. Chidambaram.

Sonia Gandh, Rahul Gandhi and all the senior leaders of the Sonia Congress party are seized by a fit of nightmare thinking about the impending 2014 electoral debacle. Their fear neurosis has been deepened and accentuated by the following factors:-

A. NEVER ENDING CONVEYOR BELT OF SONIA SCAMS resulting in total extinction of public esteem and public credibility. The people of India now view the Sonia Congress Party as a Party of criminal gangsters, by criminal gangsters, for criminal gangsters.

B. This widespread loss of NATIONAL PUBLIC FAITH has been articulated by some of the top industrialists in the country, like Shri Ratan Tata. I fully endorse his view regarding the disgraceful fall in the public image of India in the comity of nations.

C. The meteoric rise of SHRI NARENDRA MODI as a national leader capturing the imagination of the youth and the women folk of this country. Crores and Crores of people in India are praying for the DAY when Shri Narendra Modi would assume charge as the Prime Minister of India.

Courtesy: Times of India

D. Shri Narendra Modi has been hailed as the ‘King of Development’ by a U.S Thinktank. His commitment to development has won him accolades from both the major political parties in Britain. Foreign governments now expect to see Shri Modi to lead India in the contemporary international order. This international acclaim to Shri Modi follows the spate of humiliating references in the western media to the Congress Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh, as an 'underachiever' and a 'tragic figure'. Rahul Gandhi, the Prime Minister-ever-in-waiting, was described in an Economist article in September 2012 as a 'problem' figure, with half-baked political strategies, who failed to develop strong ties with any particular constituency. Rahul Gandhi is a man who strikes an attitude but lacks skills in delivering real change. Sonia Congress leaders are clearly disheartened, if not unduly depressed, by such foreign media reports. Surely such negative, though truthful reports would not have escaped the notice of Sonia's bosses in the Vatican!

E. Many of the supremely servile, corrupt, slavish, senior Congress leaders themselves are talking openly behind the scenes throughout the country today about the electoral disaster of Rahul Gandhi being an unavoidable lethal liability for the Congress Party.

When I look at the definitely corrupt and openly criminal Political Record of UPA Government under the BONELESS WONDER of a Prime Minister seeking hourly instructions for Corrupt Policies / Actions / Deeds from the Chairman of UPA Co-ordination Committee, I cannot help recalling the following incandescent words of Hon’ble Justice Brandeis uttered in a landmark judgement in USA in 1928. (United States 277 US. 438, 485): “Our Government is the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill, it teaches the whole people by its example….. If the Government becomes a LAWBREAKER, it breeds contempt for LAW; it invites every man to become a LAW unto himself; it invites ANARCHY”

On Tuesday, 27th November 2012, the Express news service reported that at a public gathering in Sanand, Gujarat, the BJP MP from Bihar’s Darbhanga  Constituency Hukumdeo Narayan Yadav declared:
“Sonia aayi hai, Videshi Company laayi hai, Gulam banana chahti hai,
(Sonia has brought foreign companies who want to enslave the country).
Kulakshini Bahu hai, ki Sasural ko bhi Kangaal banana chahti hai.
(She is a characterless daughter-in-law out to make her in-laws home bankrupt).”

I fully endorse Hukumdeo Narayan Yadav's views on Sonia Gandhi. She has been destroying the institutions of the Indian State, like the Higher Judiciary, the Election Commission, the C&AG, the Central Bureau of Investigation and so on. This corrupt alien traitor from Italy has never missed any opportunity to humiliate the magnificent Indian Armed Forces.

Now this malevolent Medusa from Italy has set her evil eyes on the Indian Treasury. To remain in power she will even empty the National Treasury. Sonia is faithfully implementing the Papal directive to destroy India as a Nation so the Missionaries can reap their rich “harvest of souls”. If we do not drive this foreign woman to her political extinction, she will drive our nation to a terminal decline.

POST SCRIPT

In most of the PAWN BROKERS' SHOPs, anyone can see that there would be a Wall-Hanging in the front with these words in the following order:

  “SHUBH LABH
   WE TRUST IN GOD
   AND FOR THE REST OUR TERMS ARE CASH”.

Crown Prince-in-Waiting Rahul Gandhi, by openly announcing with supreme self confidence his Grand Plan of PROCUREMENT OF VOTES in the 2014 and 2019 Lok Sabha Polls through CASH and nothing but CASH, has made it clear that in every ELECTION BOOTH of Sonia Congress Party in the Lok Sabha Polls in 2014, there will be wall-hanging with the following words:

  “SHUBH SONIA CONGRESS LABH
   WE DON’T TRUST ANY GOD
   OUR FAITH IS IN OUR INVINCIBLE
   CASH FOR VOTES SCHEME

AMEN!

Supreme Court puts down UPA Government’s mega corruption in Telecom sector

Supreme Court puts

down UPA

Government’s

corruption in

Telecom sector

V. SUNDARAM I.A.S

ALL INDIA GENERAL SECRETARY (IDEOLOGY) JANATA PARTY

The most decisive victory in the National War Against UPA Government’s Alpine Corruption was won in the Supreme Court yesterday (2^nd February 2012, Thursday) when Justice J.S Singhvi and Justice A.K Ganguly passed Final Orders in respect of

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 423 OF 2010 Centre for Public Interest Litigation and others (Petitioner) versus Union of India and others (Respondent)

With WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 10 OF 2011 Dr. Subramanian Swamy (Petitioner)

Versus Union of India and others (Respondent).

Justice J.S Singhvi and Justice A.K Ganguly in their historic judgment have paid glowing tributes to Dr. Subramanian Swamy and Prashant Bhushan and others by hailing them as ENLIGHTENED CITIZENS. The inspiring words of the two Supreme Court Judges, in this context, are worth quoting: “Before concluding, we consider it imperative to observe that but for the vigilance of some enlightened citizens who held important constitutional and other positions and discharged their duties in larger public interest and Non Governmental Organisations who have been constantly fighting for clean governance and accountability of the constitutional institutions, unsuspecting citizens and the Nation would never have known how the scarce natural resource spared by Army has been grabbed by those who enjoy money power and who have been able to manipulate the system.” 

I am presenting below the operative portions of the above judgment.

In the result, the writ petitions are allowed in the following terms:

(i) The licences granted to the private respondents on or after 10.1.2008 pursuant to two press releases issued on 10.1.2008 and subsequent allocation of spectrum to the licensees are declared illegal and are quashed.

(ii) The above direction shall become operative after four months.

(iii) Keeping in view the decision taken by the Central Government in 2011, TRAI shall make fresh recommendations for grant of licence and allocation of spectrum in 2G band in 22 Service Areas by auction, as was done for allocation of spectrum in 3G band.

(iv) The Central Government shall consider the recommendations of TRAI and take appropriate decision within next one month and fresh licences be granted by auction.

(v) Respondent Nos.2, 3 and 9 who have been benefited at the cost of Public Exchequer by a wholly arbitrary and unconstitutional action taken by the DoT for grant of UAS Licences and allocation of spectrum in 2G band and who offloaded their stakes for many thousand crores in the name of fresh infusion of equity or transfer of equity shall pay cost of Rs.5 crores each.  Respondent Nos 4, 6, 7 and 10 shall pay cost of Rs.50 lakhs each because they too had been benefited by the wholly arbitrary and unconstitutional exercise undertaken by the DoT for grant of UAS Licences and allocation of spectrum in 2G band.  We have not imposed cost on the respondents who had submitted their applications in 2004 and 2006 and whose applications were kept pending till 2007.

When you know that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from those who produce nothing, when you know that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favour, when you see that men get rich more easily by graft, rather than work and your Laws no longer protect you against them, but protects them against you, you know that your society is doomed! When the two Supreme Court Judges Justice J.S Singhvi and Justice A.K Ganguly who are getting convinced that India is being hustled down the path of doom by Sonia Gandhi and her pack of criminal gangsters in the UPA Government these two fearless Judges that the 2G Spectrum licenses fraudulently issued by the criminal UPA Government must be cancelled.

A careful reading of the judgment will show that the Sonia Gandhi-led UPA Government has been totally unsuccessful in their fraudulent attempts to mislead the Supreme Court of India that Pa Chidambaram had nothing to do with the 2G Spectrum pricing and the associated corrupt deeds and misdeeds of the former Union Telecom Minister A. Raja. The Supreme Court has imposed a fine of Rs 5 Crores each on Swan Telecom (Respondent 2), Unitech (Respondent 3) and Tata Teleservices (Respondent 9) on the ground that they were benefitted at the cost to the State Exchequer. This arose on account of a wholly arbitrary and unconstitutional action taken by the DoT for grant of UAS Licences and allocation of Spectrum in 2G band and these companies with the full knowledge of DOT offloaded their stakes for many thousand crores in the name of fresh infusion of equity or transfer of equity. The offloading of shares by Swan, Unitech and Tata Teleservices and their other illegal actions were subsequently ratified by Union Finance Minister Pa Chidambaram in his capacity as the Chairman of the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) and the Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh in his capacity as the Chairman of the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA). Thus, as informally directed by Sonia Gandhi, both the former Union Finance Minister Pa Chidambaram and the Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh enthusiastically facilitated the corrupt 2G Spectrum chess game of former Union Telecom Minister Raja which largely benefitted the Italian-born Sonia Gandhi.

It is very heartening to note that the Supreme Court has summarily rejected the plea of the UPA Government that Union Minister for Home Affairs P Chidambaram, who was Minister for Finance when the spectacular Sonia directed robbery of the National Exchequer occurred, should be spared from being named, probed and prosecuted as a co-accused.

It is a well established axiom of financial administration in the Government of India that not even a Rupee of expenditure can be incurred by anyone out of the Consolidated Fund of India without the written concurrence of the Finance Minister. Available written records and File Notings and Official Correspondence clearly show that the Union Telecom Minister A. Raja and former Union finance Minister Pa Chidambaram conspired together and acted in concert to defraud the National Exchequer for private gains. In this shoddy business, the Office of the Prime Minister was reduced to the level of a dispatch office.

All that the former Union Telecom Minister A. Raja did was to faithfully implement the oral orders of Sonia Gandhi which were instantaneously conveyed by her Political Secretary Ahmed Patel to both Pa Chidambaram and A Raja. Of course, the final written concurrence was given by Pa Chidambaram in his capacity as the Finance Minister.

I fully endorse the view of Dr Subramanian Swamy who has said: “The fact of the matter is the process was that Mr Chidambaram and Mr Raja will decide (on 2G pricing) together. And records show that Chidambaram was the senior partner and Raja was the junior partner. If Raja is in jail, Chidambaram should also be in jail.”

In my view, there are, of course, First Duties of Citizenship, but there are also First Duties of Government. A Citizen’s First Duty is to uphold the Law, but it is also the First Duty of the Government to enforce the Law --- to do so by prosecuting and punishing those who violate our Criminal Laws. We have all along been told and many of us have preached that ‘CRIME DOES NOT PAY’, but the recent rash and spread of defiance of law in the Sonia-led UPA Government at highest levels and the spectacular successes --- however tenuous and temporary --- of that philosophy in attaining its goals, seem to compel a reappraisal of that concept, for from what we see are commonly happening, one could reasonably believe that certain types of crime are being permitted to pay magnificently in the UPA Government. The acid cutting edge test, nay criterion, seems to be this: “Full and final gratification and satisfaction of Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi”

The collapsing and the collapsible corrupt regime of Sonia Gandhi will end sooner than later. This Government of rapacious looters is going to end not with a bang but with a whimper and it will end with Sonia and her clan’s hasty flight from India like that of the corrupt Alberto Fugimori and his clan from Peru.

Misuse of Indian

Legal System by

Chidambaram

to silence

Dr Subramanian

Swamy

By V. SUNDARAM I.A.S,
All India General Secretary (Ideology), Janata Party

The UPA Government of clowns, charlatans and criminals under the stranglehold of the Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi covered itself with disgrace when it moved the Supreme Court of India last week for an Appropriate Order against Janata Party President Dr Subramanian Swamy for publicly speaking on 2G spectrum matter, which is before both the Supreme Court and a Special Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Court.

The Government, in its application, annexed the newspaper extracts which have verbatim quoted Dr Swamy making defamatory allegations against Congress chief Sonia Gandhi, Home Minister P. Chidambram, and former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi in the context of 2G scam.

The Affidavit was filed by Sita Ram Meena, a Director in the Communication and IT Ministry.

Noting that Swamy made defamatory allegations when the Supreme Court and the Special CBI Court are seized of the 2G matter, the application said the sole object of the said Speech was to “malign and lower the image and prestige of public servants holding important offices in the Union Government and in Parliament”.

In the same Proceeding in the Supreme Court, Prashant Bhushan, Counsel for Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) completely exposed the criminal double talking and double dealing standards of the Union Government when he alleged that the Union Law and Justice Minister Salman Khurshid was interfering in the 2G trial by making statements giving clean chit to the companies facing prosecution. Prashant Bhushan also drew the attention of the Court to “how important facts were being omitted and the minister was giving unsolicited opinion”. In this context, he referred to the CBI investigation of Loop Essar and Sistema Shyam Telecom.

Senior Counsel P.P Rao, appearing for the Union Government, has brought to the notice of the Supreme Court by placing on Record an affidavit annexed with clippings of newspaper reports of the purported speech delivered by Dr Swamy in Chennai on October 20, 2011, at a lecture “Hidden facts about 2G spectrum” organised by a forum “Youth against corruption.” Senior Counsel Rao requested the Supreme Court to pass an Appropriate Order against Janata Party leader Subramanian Swamy for "maligning" the image of UPA chairperson Sonia Gandhi, Union Home Minister P Chidambaram and others in connection with the 2G scam, when the matter was “subjudice”.

According to the Union Government, Dr Swamy, an intervener in the 2G case, has publicly commented on issues which are the subject matter of pending judicial proceedings both in the Supreme Court and the trial court. "When the judgment is reserved after hearing the parties, apart from law, propriety demands that a party to the case should not speak on the subject in public and declare that certain persons, including an accused, are guilty of such offences. "The said speech shows that the sole object of Dr Subramaniam Swamy is to malign and lower the image and prestige of public servants holding important offices in the union government and in Parliament," the affidavit said.

A Bench of Justices G S Singhvi and A K Ganguly remarked, “We will look into the issue and consider whether any proceedings should be initiated, if so, against whom it should be initiated.”

Proclaiming and perpetrating fraud on stilts not only in political public meetings but also in many judicial proceedings at all levels, including the Supreme Court of India, dissemination of damned deceit and dissimulation, seems to be the undeclared policy of the anti-national and anti-social UPA Government of that corrupt Italian woman Sonia Gandhi.

The Senior Counsel Rao who was too ready to respond with tremendous speed and alacrity as the ever ready political “call taxi” of the Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi and her proudly slavish minion P. Chidambaram (now ‘adorning’ the office of the Home Minister of India) as willed with an iron hand by that Malignant Manipulator from Italy, took special care not to serve a copy of his Affidavit on Dr Subramanian Swamy. Though I do not practice Law, yet in my long career as a civil servant and later as a political journalist and now politician, I have never come across the instance of a Senior Counsel filing an Affidavit before the Supreme Court and deliberately omitting to furnish a Copy of the same to the opposing party in the case!

As no Copy of the Affidavit filed by the Senior Counsel Rao was given to Dr Subramanian Swamy, the Supreme Court Registry refused to number it.

I would like to put the following questions to the Senior Counsel Rao with reference to the broad issues raised by him against Dr Swamy. Since I have not seen the Affidavit that he might or might not have filed in the Supreme Court, I am constrained to put my questions based upon newspaper reports relating to his ‘brilliant and unsurpassed forensic skill’ and ‘legal eloquence’ displayed by him in the Supreme Court of India. Here are my questions:

1. Is Senior Counsel Rao aware of the fact that the dastardly and despicable expedient of using the Courts of Law to silence one’s political opponents resorted to earlier by the very same Sonia Gandhi against Hindu activists like Narain Kataria and Arish Sahani in USA was soundly defeated in a Court of Law in New York?

Sonia Gandhi filed a Petition in a New York Court three years ago, through the Indian National Overseas Congress (INOC) against the Hindu activists for the full-page advertisement they had inserted in New York Times fully exposing the monumental Fraud, deception, corruption of Sonia Gandhi.

I have carefully gone through the detailed legal analysis done by Kornstein Veisz Wexler & Pollard, LP, New York, the Law Firm that represented Narain Kataria and Arish Sahani in their defense case against Sonia Gandhi. The Court thoroughly understood that Sonia Gandhi was not interested in substantive justice. She was just using the Indian National Overseas Congress in America to settle political scores with Hindu activists like Narain Kataria and Arish Sahani. I would like to quote one of the most telling paragraphs from this counter-affidavit prepared by Kornstein Veisz Wexler & Pollard, LP, New York:

“It becomes clear that all of the statements complained of by the Indian National Overseas Congress are non-actionable. This politically motivated libel action by INOC Inc. should be barred at the threshold. THE STATEMENTS AT ISSUE ARE NOT `OF AND CONCERNING' THE PLAINTIFF. As a matter of constitutional law, they were not made with `actual malice'. They are, moreover, either true, free of defamatory meaning, PROCTED OPINION or PERMISSIBLE HYPERBOLE. Dismissal, now, at the start of this litigation, is amply justified and absolutely necessary, lest a bad precedent breed more such misguided libel cases. Early dismissal becomes even more essential when one considers the political context of this case. At bottom, this is a case about a U.S. subsidiary of a powerful political party in a large foreign country attempting to use our Courts to silence and intimidate its American critics in America. This is not only unacceptable; it is intolerable. WE AS A PEOPLE HAVE COMPLETELY REJECTED THE NOTION THAT A POLITICAL PARTY CAN `USE THE COURTS TO DESTROY POLITICAL OPPONENTS'. [United States v. Helstoski, 442 U.S. 477, 493 (1979)]'.”

The politically shameless and supremely corrupt Sonia Gandhi and her wholly owned family business, called the Indian National Congress, found to their dismay that the Courts of Law in America cannot be intimidated or purchased. Let Sonia Gandhi and her slavish minions like P. Chidambaram not be under the delusion that the Higher Courts of Law in India are corrupt and pliable and that they can be used to silence or destroy their political opponents! I am sure that our Higher Judiciary led by the Chief Justice of India Sarosh Homi Kapadia, a great judge known for his exceptional and unimpeachable integrity and moral courage, will definitely not allow the Indian Legal System to be misused, by any political party however powerful, to score political points and silence political opponents.

2. Is Senior Counsel Rao aware of the fact that the Constitution of India guarantees Freedom of Speech and Thought not only to Sonia Gandhi and her half breed clan and her slavish page boys in the Congress Party and Government, but also to respectable citizens like Dr Subramanian Swamy?

3. After successfully gagging the mass media –-- both print and electronic –-- is not the UPA Government trying to mis-use the instrumentality of the Supreme Court of India to gag the Constitutionally Guaranteed Freedom of Speech and Thought of Dr Subramanian Swamy by filing a shameful Affidavit?

I would say that the real difference between the responsible and true lawyer and those men who consider the Law as merely a trade is that the latter will always seek ways to permit their clients to violate the moral standards of the society without overstepping the Letter of the Law, while the former look for Principles which will persuade their clients to keep within the limits of the Spirit of the Law, in common moral standards.

What Hon’ble Justice Brandeis (1856-1941) wrote in a famous judgment in Olmstead vs. United States 277, US 438, 485 in 1928 is applicable with equal force on all fours to the supremely corrupt, collapsible and collapsing criminal government of that imposter from Italy called Sonia Gandhi: “Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its utter disregard of the Charter of its own Existence.”

I fully endorse the magisterial view of Dr Kalyanaraman on this petty, mean and small-minded sordid legal quibbling indulged in by Mr P.P Rao on behalf of the UPA Govt: “The UPA is in a panic state of emergency. It is pathetic that lawyers for the Union Govt. instead of arguing to instill sense of integrity and accountability in public service should be going after freedom of expression citing spurious judicial excuses. It is the job of the opposition to take put the government in the dock. Sonia or PC isn't above the law.”