Total Pageviews


Tuesday, October 14, 2014

A Nehru-Gandhi Family

Congress Attack on

Hindu Organizations and

Hindu Sanyasis

Saffron Terror Bogey

by V. Sundaram IAS (r.) Praveen Shanker Pillai
The Sonia Congress is obviously worried that unlike the BJP old guard, the new Narendra Modi – Amit Shah Dispensation, being neither amenable to inducements nor vulnerable to blackmail, might take up the cause of Sadhwi Pragya and other Hindu Sanyasis at a political/electoral level and get them released. When that happens, and it surely will, the Sonia Congress will be exposed even further as an essentially anti-Hindu political party working at the behest of foreign forces inimical to India.

In our earlier article dated 12-August-2011, we had written that the “Saffron Terror” Chant was officially adopted in mid-2008 by the now deposed Sonia Gandhi - the Italian Bar-Maid turned Honey-Trap turned National-Daughter-in-Law and later turned Fascist Dictator of India.

Sonia Gandhi and her Family retainers like Ahmed Patel, Digvijay Singh, Sushil Shinde and P. Chidambaram viewed “Saffron Terror” as a Political Stratagem to win Elections, even at the cost of polarizing, humiliating, debilitating and destroying India in the process. It did not occur to them that Saffron represented Asceticism and Enlightenment and that it is a colour revered by Millions of Hindus, Buddhists, Sikh and Jain people from times immemorial. The Sonia Congress Party reveres only Green Colour – not the variegated Green of the riverine Sunderbans but the murderous ISI and ISIS Green of Islamic Jihad.

To help in winning the Assembly Elections in 2008 and the Lok Sabha Elections in 2009, “Saffron Terror” had to be conjured up and nurtured in the public limelight in order to achieve the following objectives:

  A. To portray the Hindu Spiritual Swamis and Sadhwis as terrorists.
  B. To defame the Hindu Organizations like RSS/VHP/Sanatan Sanstha.
  C. To create feuds within the Hindu Nationalist Organizations
        and make them ineffective as socio-political forces.
  D. To divide the politically consolidating Hindu majority and polarize them
        into “Communal” and “Secular” factions.
  E. To convince the Muslim Leaders that the ruling Congress has delinked Islam
        from Islamic Jihad that was tormenting India.
  F. To win back the confidence of the minority communities
        and keep their electoral vote bank intact.

While the Hindu organizations like the RSS, VHP, Shiv Sena and Sanatan Sanstha have not made much impact in States like West Bengal, Telangana, Andhra, Tamil Nadu and Kerala, they have been largely successful in many other States in organizing and mobilizing Hindu societies to fight the inimical Mullah-Missionary-Marxist forces and in this process they have succeeded in bringing to power in May 2014 with absolute majority, a Nationalist party, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) at the Union Government in New Delhi.

Mullah-Missionary-Marxist forces, which are inimical to Hindu people, regard the Sonia Congress Party their Chief Patron and their Cromwellian “Lord Protector”. They have taken to heart Hastings Lionel Ismay’s saying to heart.

Hastings Lionel Ismay (1887–1965) was a British soldier - diplomat, remembered primarily for his role as The British Prime Minister Sir Winston Churchill's chief military assistant during the Second World War and for his service as the first Secretary General of NATO from 1952 to 1957. Ismay stated in 1949 that the NATO's goal was “to keep the Russians Out, the Americans In and the Germans Down”.

To keep the Hindu Organizations Out
the Mullah-Missionary-Marxist forces In and
the Hindu populace Down
is the avowed, though unstated goal of Sonia Gandhi, who according to Dr Subramanian Swamy, infiltrated into the Nehru-Gandhi Family as a Satellite, nay, Guided Missile of foreign intelligence agencies.

Sonia-inspired Congress Party’s constant refrain of “Saffron Terror” is to frighten the BJP away from the RSS and other Hindu Organizations, knowing very well that, delinked from the RSS, the BJP will be reduced to a ‘B-Team’ of the Congress Party, keeping the bench warm for the ‘Shehzada’ of the Sonia Congress Party!

The Congress Party was founded in 1885 by Sir Allan Octavian Hume (1829–1912) ICS, along with Dadabhai Naoroji and Dinshaw Wacha during the time of Viceroy Lord Dufferin. Sir Allan was always worried that the Hindu-majority people of India, suffering from a “sense of hopelessness” might indulge in “a sudden violent outbreak of sporadic crime, murders of obnoxious persons, robbery of bankers and looting of bazaars, acts really of lawlessness which by a due coalescence of forces might any day develop into a National Revolt” against the British Raj. Thus a talking shop was needed where the ‘natives’ or Hindus did not indulge in armed rebellion.

This dread of armed Hindus was shared by Jawaharlal Nehru, the grandson of the last Kotwal of the Mughals. This Nehru was described by a discerning critic as “an Englishman by education, a Muslim by culture and a Hindu by a sheer accident of birth”.

Smt. Sarojini Naidu told Lord Mountbatten that Nehru “had a completely English education, outlook and mind”. [1]

This Nehru proudly declared to John Kenneth Galbraith in 1956 at a tea table “I am the last Englishman to rule India”. Compare Nehru's description of himself with the Prime Minister Narendra Modi's description of himself to Reuters: “I am a Hindu, by birth. I am also a nationalist. So, if you say I am a Hindu nationalist, it is OK”.

Nehru never understood that Hinduism was a persecuted religion and culture, and needed relief from Islamic banditry. But he preached a new type of slavery in the name of secularism. - ‘India Betrayed: The Role of Nehru’ by Brigadier (Retd.) B.N. Sharma. [2]

The Patriotic Hindus who did not accept the new form of slavery which called itself Secularism, the Sanatani Hindus who were imbued with the valorous Kshatriya spirit, the Nationalistic Hindus who agree with the dictum of Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790): “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety” earned Nehru's irrepressible ire and implacable hatred.


When Lt. General Sir Robert Lockhart, the first Commander-in-Chief of Independent India took a strategic plan for a Government directive on defence policy, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru blew his top: “Rubbish! Total rubbish! We don’t need a defence plan. Our policy is ahimsa (non-violence). We foresee no military threats. Scrap the army! The police are good enough to meet our security needs”. [3]

After getting freedom, one meeting was organized to select the first General of Indian Army. Leaders and Army officers were discussing to whom this responsibility should be given. In between the discussion Nehru said: “I think we should appoint a British officer as a General of Indian Army as we don't have Indian Officers with enough experience to lead the Army.” [4]] Of course, the Grand Mogul of Independent India wouldn’t want a “Kaffir” as his Army Chief! For him, a white-skinned foreigner is definitely preferable to a brown-skinned “Kaffir”!

Working under the firm "Foreign Hand" of Sonia Gandhi, an Islam-Embracing, Christianity-Coveting, and Hindu-Hating Woman Catholic Imposter from Italy, the Sonia Congress UPA Government had a special interest in destroying the morale and war-preparedness of the Defence Forces of the Hindu-majority India.


The other organization that attracted the malevolent attention of the Congress Party in general and Nehru in particular is the largest, though still unarmed, body of patriotic Hindus – the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh or the RSS, which was founded in 1925 by Dr Keshav Baliram Hedgewar as part of the movement against British rule and as a response to Muslim attacks on unarmed and unprepared Hindus. A major emphasis is placed on dedication and discipline, both mental and physical, as a means to restore strength, courage and valour in Hindu youth and to foster unity among Hindus of all castes and classes. Paramilitary training and daily exercise and drills are part of this discipline.


On 4th Feb 1948, M.S. Golwalkar then the RSS chief was arrested, by Nehru's Government and RSS was banned.

This is what the Nehru Government Communiqué, which banned RSS on 04th February 1948, said: “It has been found that in several parts of the country individual members of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh have indulged in acts of violence involving arson, robbery, dacoity, and murder and have collected illicit arms and ammunitions. They have been found circulating leaflets exhorting people to resort to terrorist methods, to collect fire arms, to create disaffection against the Government and suborn the Police and the Military.” This was five days after Gandhiji’s assassination.[6]

T.R. Venkatrama Shastri, former Advocate General of Madras met Sardar Patel and informed the latter that the accusation of RSS’ complicity in Gandhi’s assassination had no real foundation, and "charges against the RSS in some cases having been found unsustainable". The ban was unconditionally lifted on 9th July 1949. Nehru's daughter Maimuna Begum (Indira Gandhi) too banned the RSS during the dark days of the illegal Emergency Rule of 1975-77.


This is what I had written in April 15, 2006 in an article titled, 'RSS had informed planned massacre of Hindus and flag of "Pakistan" on the Red Fort'.
“Recently I was going through the records and archives of this period. A solid fact which has been hidden from public view by the Nehru Government in 1947 and later by all congress Governments relates to the plot which was hatched by the Muslim League to bump off the entire Congress leadership on 10th September 1947 in New Delhi. The planned Muslim coup was unsuccessful because of the timely information given by Sri Guruji through his RSS volunteers to Sardar Patel about the attempted Muslim coup. The Muslim coup was foiled on account of the sharp vigilance displayed by the RSS. Even at that time, there were many right-thinking, non-partisan people who duly recognised and admired the stellar role played by the RSS. One of the most notable among them was Bharat Ratna Dr. Bhagwan Das, a profound thinker and philosopher and the revered father of Sri Sriprakasha, Ex-High Commissioner for Pakistan and later Governor of Tamil Nadu. Dr. Bhagwan Das declared in his article in the ‘ORGANISER’ on 16th October 1948: “I have been reliably informed that a number of youths of the RSS were able to inform Sardar Patel and Nehruji in the very nick of time of the (Muslim) Leaguers" intended "coup” on September 10, 1947, whereby they had planned to assassinate all Members of Government and all Hindu officials and thousands of Hindu citizens on that day and plant the flag of "Pakistan" on the Red Fort and then seize all of Hind. If these high-spirited and self-sacrificing boys had not given the very timely information to Nehruji and Patelji, there would have been no Government of India today, the whole country would have changed its name into Pakistan, tens of millions of Hindus would have been slaughtered and all the rest converted to Islam or reduced to stark slavery....Well, what is the net result of all this long story? Simply this: that our Government should utilise, and not sterilise, the patriotic energies of the lakhs of RSS youths.” ” ( This explains the 06th January 1948, Statement by Sardar Patel issued just three weeks before Gandhiji’s assassination.


On 06th Jan 1948, Sardar Patel issued a statement that was directly contrary to what was mentioned about the Sangh in the ban-communiqué. Targeting his own party men, he said: “In the Congress those who are in power feel that by virtue of their authority they will be able to crush the RSS by danda (force)…danda is meant for dacoits and thieves…The RSS men are not thieves and dacoits. They are patriots…only their trend of thought is diverted” (“The Hindu”, Madras dated 7th Jan. 1948.).
Patriotic, yes but Diverted! Diverted from what? Diverted from Gandhian appeasement of Muslims at any cost to the Hindus? We say with pride, then so be it!

It was clear that of these Congress men “in power”, Nehru was foremost in wanting to use the danda against the RSS. Even just before Gandhiji’s assassination, on 29th Jan at Amritsar, Nehru had vowed to “demolish” the RSS. Gandhiji’s assassination was just an excuse. The charged atmosphere following the assassination strengthened the hands of those who had been against the RSS from much before. [7]

Leading Hindu social and political leaders held an All India Hindu Conference in Allahabad in 1910 to organise Indian Hindus politically in response to the rise of the Muslim League. The Hindu Mahasabha was founded in 1914 in Amritsar with headquarters in Haridwar. In 1925, Hindu Mahasabha's former member Dr Keshav Baliram Hedgewar left to form the RSS.

Hindu Mahasabha's one-time rising star, Syama Prasad Mookerjee, left the party and established the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, the forerunner to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which is today the largest Hindu nationalist political party in India. The organizational and ideological linkages between the RSS and the BJP are being sought to be cut by the alien Congress Party from the Mughal Nehru to the Italian Sonia by raising the bogey of “Saffron Terror”.


Finding that Sonia Gandhi’s DIVISIVE AND POLARISING POLITICS have failed to stop the tide of BJP electoral victory after victory, on the one hand and seeing the negative results of narco tests on Swami Amritanand Tirth Dev, on the other, the Sonia Congress-controlled Maharashtra Government’s ATS, in its desperation to please its beleaguered political masters in Maharashtra, made a complete u-Turn. The ATS, which accused the RSS of being an instigator and perpetrator of “Saffron Terror”, made an outlandish claim that the RSS is a VICTIM of “Saffron Terror”!

With the latest 'spin' that the Malegon accused have conspired to kill RSS leaders, the Anti Terrorism Squad of the Maharashtra Police has shot itself in the foot. On the explicit instructions of its political masters to paint Hindu Organisations as not only radical but also violent, the ATS has discredited itself even further. A Congress spokesperson has gone on record saying that the Hindu outfits are engaged in a 'civil war' within and advising the BJP to stay away from them and stop supporting such outfits.


The Sonia Congress is obviously worried that unlike the BJP old guard, the new Dispensation of the Dynamic Duo, Narendra Modi – Amit Shah, being neither amenable to inducements nor vulnerable to blackmail, might take up the cause of Sadhwi Pragya and other Hindu Sanyasis at a political/electoral level and get them released. When that happens, and it surely will, the Sonia Congress will be exposed even further as an essentially anti-Hindu political party working at the behest of foreign forces inimical to India.

The Italian-born Edvige Antonia Albina Màino a.k.a Sonia Gandhi and her alien half-breed Family and their slavish lackeys and courtiers, both in the Congress and in the Main Stream Media, will pay very dearly in the coming Maharashtra Assembly Elections to be held on 15th October 2014 for the racial and religious oppression of Hindu Sanyasis and Sadhwis, including Sadhwi Pragya.

We place on record our deep and abiding respect for the brave Maharatta warrior, the Mumbai Police Assistant Sub-Inspector Tukaram Ombale who captured Ajmal Kasab on 26th November 2008 during the ISI backed sea-born jihadi attack on Mumbai. We also take this opportunity to warn those who conduct subterranean subterfuge and ally with the anti-national forces led by the Sonia Congress to defeat Hindu Nationalist BJP led from the front by the most popular and most respected Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi-ji. Hiding behind the mask of ‘Marathi Manoos’ will not save any one who make common cause with the oppressors of Hindu Sanyasis and Sadhwis. They will face electoral obliteration and fade into political oblivion.

[1] (Vide ‘Mountbatten and Independence of India’, Vikas, P. 88).
[2] (Manas Publications, New Delhi-110 002, 1997):- (
[3] 'General Rudra: His service in three Armies and two World Wars' by Major General D.K. Palit
[4] 'War and Diplomacy in Kashmir, 1947-48'by Chandrashekhar Dasgupta, Sage Publications.
[5]'The 1962 India China Conflict' by Wing Commander (retd.) R V Parasnis.

No comments: