Follow by Email

Total Pageviews

CURRENT ARTICLES OF V. SUNDARAM (JANUARY 2010 ONWARDS)

Friday, April 29, 2011

UNDECLARED EMERGENCY IN INDIA -

SONIA GAGGING OF THE PRESS AND
INTERNET IN INDIA

V.SUNDARAM I.A.S.

ALL INDIA GENERAL SECRETARY (IDEOLOGY) JANATA PARTY

James Madison (1751-1836), one of the Founding Fathers of the American State, wrote as follows on 16th June 1788: “I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of the Freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations.”

I assert my fundamental right not only to Freedom of Speech but more importantly my indivisible, inalienable, inexorable and immutable right to Freedom after Speech. I derive my daily inspiration for writing my pro-Dharma articles from the following immortal words of John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) in his famous article ‘ON LIBERTY’ in 1859. “If all mankind, minus one, were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person, than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.” Firangi Memsahib and Sonia Congress Dictator from Mussolini’s Italy seems to be hell bent on silencing 122 Crores of people in India today. Her errand boy Pa Chidambaram seems to have voluntarily come forward with unconcealed enthusiasm and commitment to undertake the despicable agenda of the Firangi Memsahib.


Benito Mussolini                  Sonia Gandhi
Italian Fascist Dictator        Italian Dictator in India

The people of India are shocked to read the recent note sent by Dr. Subramanian Swamy, former Union Cabinet Minister for Law and Commerce and currently President of Janata Party.

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Subramanian Swamy wrote:

A meeting was held a week ago called by Sonia at PC's house to enable intelligence chiefs to attend on protocol. There it was decided to develop Draconian measures to meet "national security" emergency. This web matter is a part of it. NRIs get organised to be ready for a repeat of 1975-77. [Dr. Subramanian Swamy wrote the above lines on Thursday, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:19 AM] - (Source-VivekJyoti Blogspot)

It is reliably understood that Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi dictatorially directed her ever willing supplicant Union Home Minister P.Chidambaram to do all that he can to put down freedom of speech in India. She is reported to have told him: “Don’t I know the slavish, creeping and crawling beggarly Indians? If you kick them mercilessly they will prostrate on their knees! If you say ‘Namaste’ to them they will kick you with redoubled vigour.” The Union Home Minister is reported to have instructed the Union Telecom Ministry to monitor all Internet Articles and emails and to take such steps as necessary to restrict or ban them as the case may be.

I fully endorse the view of Dr. S. Kalyanaraman in this context. These are his words:

“The arrival of SoniaG on the Indian political scene has been an unmitigated disaster for the rule of law in India. Almost every constitutional institution has been subverted by promoting chamcha-giri, starting with the PM downwards and not sparing KGB (the ex Chief Justice of India who introduced the 'staleness doctrine' to protect SoniaG from legal consequences of writing false affidavits under oath). Now, this report. What is happening in India is a constitutional emergency achieved without declaring a state of emergency.
SoniaG, go, quit politics. Singhasan khaali karo ke janataa aati hai.”


A very important and seminal article by Vikas Bajaj in the ‘New York Times’ and ‘International Herald Tribune’ on 27-4-2011 fully exposes the evil and autocratic designs of Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi and her wholly owned Private Limited Company called the UPA II Government of India to put down ruthlessly all Freedom of Speech guaranteed under the Indian Constitution. I am presenting below the full text of this article.



An Internet cafe in New Delhi. New rules require Web sites and service providers to remove some content that officials and even private citizens find objectionable.

Published: April 27, 2011

MUMBAI, India — Free speech advocates and Internet users are protesting new Indian regulations restricting Web content that, among other things, can be considered “disparaging,” “harassing,” “blasphemous” or “hateful.”
The new rules, quietly issued by the country’s Department of Information Technology earlier this month and only now attracting attention, allow officials and private citizens to demand that Internet sites and service providers remove content they consider objectionable on the basis of a long list of criteria.
Critics of the new rules say the restrictions could severely curtail debate and discussion on the Internet, whose use has been growing fast in India.
The list of objectionable content is sweeping and includes anything that “threatens the unity, integrity, defense, security or sovereignty of India, friendly relations with foreign states or public order.”
The rules highlight the ambivalence with which Indian officials have long treated freedom of expression. The country’s constitution allows “reasonable restrictions” on free speech but lawmakers have periodically stretched that definition to ban books, movies and other material about sensitive subjects like sex, politics and religion.
An Indian state, for example, recently banned an American author’s new biography of the Indian freedom fighter Mohandas Gandhi that critics have argued disparages Mr. Gandhi by talking about his relationship with another man.
Although fewer than 10 percent of Indians have access to the Internet, that number has been growing fast — especially on mobile devices. There are more than 700 million cellphone accounts in India.
The country has also established a thriving technology industry that writes software and creates Web services primarily for Western clients.
Even before the new rules — known as the Information Technology (Intermediaries guidelines) Rules, 2011 — India has periodically tried to restrict speech on the Internet. In 2009, the government banned a popular and graphic online comic strip, Savita Bhabhi, about a housewife with an active sex life. Indian officials have also required social networking sites like Orkut to take down posts deemed offensive to ethnic and religious groups.
Using a freedom of information law, the Center for Internet and Society, a Bangalore-based research and advocacy group, recently obtained and published a list of 11 Web sites banned by the Department of Information Technology. Other government agencies have probably blocked more sites, the group said.
The new Internet rules go further than existing Indian laws and restrictions, said Sunil Abraham, the executive director for the Center for Internet and Society. The rules require Internet “intermediaries” — an all-encompassing group that includes sites like YouTube and Facebook and companies that host Web sites or provide Internet connections — to respond to any demand to take down offensive content within 36 hours. The rules do not provide a way for content producers to defend their work or appeal a decision to take content down.
“These rules overly favor those who want to clamp down on freedom of expression,” Mr. Abraham said. “Whenever there are limits of freedom of expression, in order for those limits to be considered constitutionally valid, those limits have to be clear and not be very vague. Many of these rules that seek to place limits are very, very vague.”
An official for the People’s Union for Civil Liberties, an advocacy group based in New Delhi, said on Wednesday that it was considering a legal challenge to the constitutionality of the new rules.
“What are we, Saudi Arabia?” said Pushkar Raj, the group’s general secretary. “We don’t expect this from India. This is something very serious.”
An official at the Department of Information Technology, Gulshan Rai, did not return calls and messages.
The rules are based on a 2008 information technology law that India’s Parliament passed shortly after a three-day siege on Mumbai by Pakistan-based terrorists that killed more than 163 people. That law, among other things, granted authorities more expansive powers to monitor electronic communications for reasons of national security. It also granted privacy protections to consumers.
While advocates for free speech and civil liberties have complained that the 2008 law goes too far in violating the rights of Indians, Internet firms have expressed support for it. The law removed liability from Internet intermediaries as long as they were not active participants in creating content that was later deemed to be offensive.
Subho Ray, the president of the Internet and Mobile Association of India, which represents companies like Google and eBay, said the liability waiver was a big improvement over a previous law that had been used to hold intermediaries liable for hosting content created by others. In 2004, for instance, the police arrested eBay’s top India executive because a user of the company’s Indian auction site had offered to sell a video clip of a teenage couple having sex.
“The new I.T. Act (2008) is, in fact, a large improvement on the old one,” Mr. Ray said in an e-mail response to questions.
Mr. Ray said his association had not taken a stand on the new regulations. An India-based spokeswoman for Google declined to comment on the new rules, saying the company needed more time to respond.
Along with the new content regulations, the government also issued rules governing data security, Internet cafes and the electronic provision of government services.

I am also presenting below just one sample of public reaction from one of the public spirited and patriotic citizen of India against the nefarious move of the UPA II Government of India to put down freedom of speech and communication in and through the Internet. Government of India has already gagged the fully paid Mass Media in India—both print and electronic.

IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THIS DRACONIAN ANTI-PEOPLE PROCESS, UPA II GOVERNMENT IS HELL-BENT UPON GAGGING THE INTERNET BY INSTRUCTION IF POSSIBLE AND INTIMIDATION AND CRUEL AND INHUMAN INCARCERATION IF NECESSARY!! THIS IS A WAKEUP CALL TO ALL THE ENLIGHTENED, WELL-MEANING AND PUBLIC SPIRITED CITIZENS OF INDIA!! ALL THE NON-CONGRESS DULY ELECTED STATE GOVERNMENTS MUST KNOW THAT PRESIDENT’S RULE CAN BE IMPOSED ON THEIR STATES AND THEIR GOVERNMENTS DISMISSED LIKE THIRD-GRADE MUNICIPALITIES BY THE FIRANGI MEMSAHIB MUSSOLINI TYPE FASCIST UPA II GOVERNMENT!!

From: satyajit1940
Date: Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:58 AM
Subject: [hc] Is India heading towards Dictator rule?
To: hinducivilization@yahoogroups.com (SOURCE FOR THE FOLLOWING EXPLOSIVELY REVEALING ARTICLE)

IS INDIA HEADING FOR A DICTATOR RULE?

If the sources within the intelligence are believed, it may be true. Very recently, a high level meeting was called at the residence of Union Home Minister P.Chidambaram, which was attended by loyal confidants of Sonia Gandhi which included Digvijay Singh, Ahmed Patel, Jayanth Natarajan, Ambika Soni, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Manish Tiwari, Veerapan moily etc. Surprisingly top officials from IB, NIA, CBI, Cyber Cell, DRI, IT dept and few Media magnets close to congress leaders were invited for the close door meeting.

One officer, who wished not to be named, made some startling revelations about the outcome of the meeting. The High profile people present at the meeting, discussed about 2G Spectrum scam and other scams which is haunting the government from time to time A vitriolic Congress General Secretary Digvijay Singh raised the issue of Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi been targeted frequently by many sections of the society terming as unscrupulous forces. In contrast to this the Home Minister quoted "He in is individualy capacity has committed to protect the integrity of Gandhi family and directed the officials present their to deal mercilessly who target their leaders. He instructed the intelligence officials to keep a vigilant track of emails, sms and other modes of communication exchanged between people in India. With a strong worded signal to officials, he directed that if any individual/organization (including religious institutions) are involved in speaking/distributing/propagating which hurts the interest of the Gandhi's, Congress, to a larger extent even to minorities, such people should be fixed in a case where procuring bail is impossible something equating with terrorism case or depending upon the gravity of the issue, (quoting the example of Sadhvi Praga). Manish Tiwari Quickly retorted and reminded the officials about their predecessor who was sacked after UPA came into Power. The sacked official was instrumental in stalling Mrs. (Sonia) Gandhi from becoming the Prime Minister of India who had presented certain confidential documents before former President of India. Dr.APJ Abdul Kalam

Digvijay Singh demanded a really stringent tough law to tackle people who would even dare to speak against Sonia, Rahul or Priyanka, something on the lines of martial law, which other leaders did not react. Subsequently, Jayanthi Natarajan, was satisified with the decision taken by the Home Ministers direction. Few Media barons present at meeting pledged to extend all help in every manner.

The Officer stated, that all this officials are helpless and are forced to doing something which they do not like, they become scapegoats in the eyes of people and media by the act of this beasts. He further quoted that few opposition leaders are also bought by congress leaders to suppress them from speaking anything against Rahul and Soniaji. One name which ispopularly doing rounds is that of Ranjan Bhatacharya who plays a mediator role between Congress and BJP leaders. It is at his disposal, he fixes meetings between them at some undisclosed places.
__________________________________________________________

I am sure many would agree with me that the above outcome of the meeting clearly signifies a Dictator rule for the blank future of India. Are Gandhi family above the Law in India, indefinitely seems so, we have a weak judiciary which is scared to prosecute them in even Multi billion dollar corruption scam.

If we do not protest or challenge the same, our Country will turn into another Afghanistan, Libya, with atrocity on streets of India by the so called leaders.

Only the Judiciary and the Defence Personnel can save the country from the clutches of this Greedy politicians of our country.

We have made a big mistake by extending our faith in BJP, which in course of time has proved to be a frontier organization of the Congress.

Wikileaks rightly proved about Arun Jaitley "Who admitted that Hindutva is just a political issue" on similar lines of minorities are just vote bank for Congress.

Think before it is too late, I am forwarding this message to all Indians, I am sure, you too would do in the interest of FREE DEMOCRATIC BHARAT.

JAI HIND.

Retired Intelligence Officer

CONCLUSION

Drunk with unchallenged power without responsibility, Firangi Memsahib seems to be under the delusion that the India of 2011 is the same as the Abyssinia of 1935-36 which was savagely raped by her fellow countryman Benito Mussolini. The whole world knows about the infamous story of the savage colonial rape and occupation of Abyssinia by Italy. The hangman of Mussolini(1883-1945) in Abyssinia was General Badoglio. On specific telegraphic instructions of Mussolini, Badoglio's troops made substantial use of mustard gas, in both artillery and aerial bombardments. Use of mustard gas completely and blatantly violated the 1925 Geneva Protocol that Italy had signed. In total, the Italians deployed between 300 and 500 tonnes of mustard gas during the war. The deployment of poison gas was not restricted to the battlefield, however, as civilians were also targeted by the Italians, as part of their attempt to terrorise the local population. Furthermore, the Italians carried out gas attacks at least 19 times on Red Cross camps and ambulances in Abyssinian areas. Mussolini and his generals sought to cloak the operations of chemical warfare in the utmost secrecy, but the use of gas was revealed to the world through the denunciations by the International Red Cross and of many foreign observers. In all 30,000 people were killed in the violent Italian colonial religious and racial repression of Abyssinia in 1935-36.

The predominant part of the work of repression was carried out by Italians who, besides the bombs laced with mustard gas, instituted forced labour camps, installed public gallows, killed hostages, and mutilated the corpses of their enemies. Graziani ordered the elimination of captured guerrillas by way of throwing them out of airplanes in mid-flight. Many Italian troops had themselves photographed next to cadavers hanging from the gallows or hanging around chests full of detached heads.

Very much like her criminal countryman and her father’s employer, Mussolini, Firangi Memsahib is under the delusion that she is maintaining absolute secrecy about her Sonia Congress Pogrom of crushing the Spirit, urges, hopes, aspirations and above all civil liberties of the Indian people. 

On 30th June 1936, the defeated Emperor of Abyssinia Haile Selassie spoke at the League of Nations. The Emperor was introduced by the President of the Assembly as “His Imperial Majesty, the Emperor of Ethiopia” ("Sa Majesté Imperiale, l'Empereur d'Ethiopie"). In response, a group of Italian journalists began yelling insults and they had to be ejected before he could speak. The Romanian Chairman, Nicolae Titulescu, famously reacted to the buffoonery exhibited by the Italian journalists. He jumped to his feet and shouted: "To the door with the savages!" ("A la porte les sauvages!").

Emperor Haile Selassie then gave a stirring speech denouncing Italy's actions and criticizing the world community for standing by. At the conclusion of his speech, which appeared on newsreels throughout the world, Emperor Haile Selassie warned the Italian Fascist dictator Mussolini that: “IT IS US TODAY. IT WILL BE YOU TOMORROW.” Emperor Haile Selassie did not have to wait for long for nemesis to overtake Mussolini. Mussolini was shot and killed on 28th April 1945, along with his Fascist entourage of servile Ministers and officials, I mean Mussolini’s gangsters and murderers.

After being shot, kicked, and spat upon, the bodies of Mussolini and his fellow gangsters were hung upside down on meat hooks from the roof of an Esso gas station. The bodies were then stoned by civilians from below. This was done both to discourage any Fascists from continuing the fight and as an act of revenge for the hanging of many partisans in the same place by Axis authorities. The corpse of the deposed leader became subject to ridicule and abuse. Fascist loyalist Achille Starace who once said of Mussolini “He is a god,” was captured and sentenced to death and shot. The body of Starace was subsequently strung up next to the body of Mussolini. Fascist loyalist Achille Starace behaved very much like the Sonia slaves of today like Pranab Mukherjee, Pa Chidambaram, Kapil Sibal, Ambika Soni, Abhisekh Singhvi, Manish Tiwari, Jayanthi Natarajan and other clans and categories of supine and spineless Congress chattels and vermin!

As a former Civil Servant who served with distinction in the Indian Administrative Service from 1965 to 1994 and now as a freelance journalist, in this context, I would like to use the eternally relevant words, which the Emperor Haile Selassie used against Mussolini, then at the height of his absolute power, at the meeting of the League of Nations, “IT IS US TODAY. IT WILL BE YOU TOMORROW.”

Firangi Memsahib Sonia and her hangers’ on in the Congress party should learn their salutary lessons from the disastrous life and times of the Italian Fascist dictator Benito Mussolini. Karl Marx was absolutely right when he said: “History repeats itself and historians repeat each other!”

Let me conclude in the words of Thomas Jefferson, another Founding Father of the American State: 
“RESISTANCE TO TYRANTS IS OBEDIENCE TO GOD.”



 

Sunday, April 24, 2011

GIGANTIC FRAUD ANNA HAZARE,
AND GARGANTUAN FRAUD SONIA & THE SHADY CIVIL SOCIETY GROUP-2

V.SUNDARAM I.A.S.

Walter Savage Landor (1775-1864) wrote: “If there were no falsehood in the world, there would be no doubt; if there were no doubt, there would be no inquiry, no wisdom, no knowledge, no genius!”


Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803-1882) wrote in his essay on ‘PrudenceEvery violation of truth is not only a sort of suicide in the liar, but a stab at the health of human society”.

Anatole France (1844-1924) wroteWithout lies humanity would perish of despair and boredom”.



At the outset I wish to make it categorically clear that the Paramount National Need of The Hour is a properly drawn up JAN LOKPAL BILL. But this has to be drawn up by a Committee consisting of members, official and non-official, with a proven track record of unshakeable and absolute integrity. Judged by this yardstick, most of the members from the Government Side and the Civil Society Side, have a poor record in terms of absolute integrity which can stand any judicial scrutiny and therefore, in my view, they are not morally and ethically eligible to be members of the Drafting Committee.

I have already explained in detail in Part I of this article the findings of the Justice P.B. Sawant Commission of Inquiry on the doubtful integrity of Anna Hazare. Justice Sawant gave a list of the proven instances of corruption, illegality and maladministration in the Trusts run by Anna Hazare. State Ministers indicted by the Justice Sawant Commission had to resign but HAZARE WAS MORPHED INTO AN ANTI-CORRUPTION ICON. If only Anna Hazare had been a man of absolute and unshakeable integrity, then the unchallenged Monarch and Queen of Corruption Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi would not have extended her dubious olive branch of feigned, faithless Sonia Congress friendship to Gandhi Cap Anna Hazare

Anna Hazare is a man of double standards and multiple tongues. He is ready to close his eyes on the unprecedented loot and plunder of Sonia Gandhi and her half-breed family. But he is very vocal and vehement on the corruption of Sharad Pawar. He will demand the resignation of Kapil Sibal but not demand the banishment of Sonia Gandhi, the GANGOTRI OF HIMALAYAN CORRUPTION, from the sacred soil of India. Nor would he demand the resignation of supremely corrupt Union Ministers like Pranab Mukherjee or P.Chidambaram.

I have already referred to the fraudulent NGOs run by the Social Activists surrounding and revolving round Anna Hazare like Swami Agnivesh and Kejriwal. Digvijay Singh had the temerity to put this question to Anna Hazare recently: ’Why have you not included Aruna Roy and Harsh Mander as members of your Civil Society Group in the Jan Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee?’

The spectacularly fraudulent  anti-national track record of Aruna Roy and Harsh Mander and many other such shady characters in the permanent pay of not only the Sonia Congress Party but that of several wheeler dealers from several International NGOs in USA and the West as a whole has been fully documented in the book “NGOs, ACTIVISTS AND FOREIGN FUNDS, ANTI-NATION INDUSTRY edited by Radha Rajan and Krishen Kak, and published by Vigil Public Opinion Forum, Chennai in 2006. I am presenting the Front Cover of this Book below




This explosive book fully exposes the Multi-Fanged Falsehood and Fraud of so-calledCIVIL SOCIETY’

The book edited by Radha Rajan and Krishen Kak fully exposes the viciously corrupt ways of NGOs and the so-called Social activists like Aruna Roy, Sandeep Pandey, Arundhati Roy, Nirmala Deshpande, Admiral Ramdas, Harsh Mander and others. A few of them are THE LEADING LIGHTS in the National Advisory Council of which Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi- the GANGOTRI OF ALL VENAL CORRUPTION in India---is the Chairman. In particular I would Invite The attention of all my readers to the article written by Krishen Kak Titled ‘Scoring Against Paganism: Untangling The Mander Web’ in Chapter 7 of this book. I would also invite the attention of my readers to the article written by Mrs.Radha Rajan titled ‘NGOs and Activists: Singing for their Supper’ in Chapter 8 of this book.

Here is a sample of Krishen Kak’s assessment of Harsh Mander as: "The incontrovertible fact is that Mr. Mander’s public persona is built on a monumental fraud. A former Action Aid senior executive in an email titled ‘Look Ma! The Emperor has no clothes!’ circulated in Jan. 2003 to Mander and to Action Aid offices and individual staff all over the world, began it ‘AAI Country Director Harsh Mander is a liar...’ [ !! ] "

Here is Krishen Kak’s soulful tribute to Aruna Roy: " Magsaysay awardee and ex-IAS officer Aruna Roy, self-proclaimed defender of democracy in Gujarat (but not in Bihar) and self-proclaimed defender of ‘secular’ rights for Muslims in Gujarat (but not Sikhs in Delhi, Reangs in the northeast, or Pandits in Kashmir), with Jean Dreze and others, publicly derided as communalists and worse those who dared question Mander’s ‘unquestioned integrity’. However, she is still silent about his unquestionable ‘resignation’ and other lies. “
Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi takes extreme care and caution only to foster and support singularly corrupt and unscrupulous men and women. In her scheme of things, to be essentially corrupt, is the basic minimum condition for qualifying for any post in her Banana Republic Non-Government. BUT THIS WILL NEVER BE A SUFFICIENT CONDITION. Chief Injustice Balakrishnan was her favourite for this reason. P.J.Thomas, the Firangi Memsahib Sonia –famous Vigilance Commissioner had a special place in Sonia’s scheme of nefarious things! Many of Sonia favourites drawn from the NGO sector into the National Advisory Council—Aruna Roy, Harsh Mander and the like---belong to this ‘category’. I mean the Ottavio Quattrocchi category. Sonia’s titillating infatuation for the likes and types of Ottavio Quattrocchi is  unquenchable—proverbial and celebrated.

Krishen Kak has invited my attention to Kejriwal's NGO's publicly-stated accounts.

The movement called "India Against Corruption" (IAC) solicits money from the public but has no account of its own.  This money is passed on to a Kejriwal NGO called "Public Cause Research Foundation" (PCRF, founded in 2006) that in its website till at least April 18, 2011 listed no information of IAC money it had collected.  It presented its accounts from 2006 to 2009 and their analysis showed that, for 2006 to 2008, money that it reported as used for "charitable purposes" had in fact been used entirely on itself for its routine office/administration expenses.  It reported a corpus fund, the amount and nature of which fluctuated -

On April 1, 2006 the corpus fund was Rs 13,01,000. 

On March 31, 2007 this had grown to Rs 14,49,168.10 notwithstanding expenses debited from it of Rs 6,31,797, loans given from it of Rs 2,15,000, and donations received of only Rs 21,400.

On April 1, 2007 the corpus fund had become 
a "specific corpus fund" with only Re 1,000 (that added Rs 8,10,000 to itself by March 31, 2008), and
a "nonspecific corpus fund" with Rs 12,48,566 in it.

No donations were reported for that year, and the loans from PCRF were to another  Kejriwal NGO that was founded in 1999, that solicited funds on its website but gave no account of them there.

On March 31, 2009, the corpus fund (a single one again) had shot up to Rs 31,51,416,  the loans given were Rs 2,46,274, and no donations were reported.

There is no financial information for after 31/3/09.

Recall that Kejriwal was in the income-tax service.   

Your IAC money – which you gave because of Hazare? - is channeled into Kejriwal’s PCRF and from there into other Kejriwal NGOs.

Then, during and after the "picnic"  that was the Hazare "fast-unto-death", questions were loudly asked (including by this writer) of who had paid for that media and marketing event and who had kept its accounts.

Forced to respond, IAC issued a press statement and also put up data on its website.

It is not clear from the IAC website when this “movement” was started but the money it collects goes to PCRF - which, at least till April 18, 2011, had made no reference in its website to IAC or IAC's money. 

Now, click on "Receipts and Expenditure" in  IAC's website. It opens to a receipt and expenditure "statement...for 30th January rally, indefinite fast in April and all activities related to preparations thereof". 

It reports donations received of Rs 82,87,668, including 2,871 donations of less than Rs 5,000 each. There are 101 donors of Rs 5,000 and above (though, oddly, the amount has not been totaled), including

Rs 25,00,000 by “Jindal Aluminium Ltd/Mr. Sitaram Jindal”, 
Rs 3,00,000 by the “Eicher Good Earth Trust Mr. Vikram Lal”,
Rs 2,00,000 by Shriram Investments,
Rs 50,000 by HDFC Bank,
Rs 25,000 by Common Cause,
Rs 20,000 by Carmel Convent School , and
Rs 10,000 by the Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd.

The expenses reported are Rs 32,69,900, including Rs 81,751 for "food", Rs 44,908 for "medical for those on fast", and Rs 4,61,382 for "traveling and conveyance". 

That's what IAC says.[7]   But Kejriwal says differently.  According to him, the expenses include "Rs.6 lakh-Rs.7 lakh spent in Mumbai. Mumbai accounts were also included in this".

So, whom do we believe?

Rupees 82,87,668 was given over a number of months to IAC (which has Kejriwal as a founder); IAC passed on the money to PCRF (founded by Kejriwal) that, till April 18, 2011, still had not declared this receipt on its official website.  

IAC (PCRF?) spent Rs 32,69,900 on its 30th January rally and its five-day April "picnic".  

What happened to the balance of Rs 50,17,768? 

That’s right – 50 lakh rupees collected from the public.

Is it held by PCRF in a separate account for IAC, and is this legal?  Or is it added to PCRF's corpus, and is that ethical?  Is it earning interest?  Who gets that income? 

Isn't the public entitled to know? 

Krishen Kak sums up succinctly and brilliantly: “PCRF's website boasts it "works for just, transparent, accountable and participatory governance", but there’s not a single word in its website regarding the IAC movement.   And now with a cool Rs 50 lakhs in his own NGO’s kitty to take care of many of his expenses, we need not be impressed that Kejriwal declines the sarkari allowance offered for attending the meetings of the joint drafting committee or, for that matter, that he discloses his relatively modest personal assets.”

Curiously, Hazare, in disclosing his personal assets, declared cash assets worth Rs.68,688.36. The same Hazare was able to make cash advances to one of his NGOs of Rs 70,000 in 1993-94, Rs 50,122 in 1994-95, Rs 1,75,000 in 1997-98, and Rs 69,555 in 2002-03 with all that money being returned to him in cash in violation of the Income Tax Act - an illegality, as Justice Sawant noted.

Anna Hazare had demanded that the public officials appointed to the joint drafting committee should be completely untainted. Therefore, those who, on behalf of "civil society", have selected themselves to the joint drafting committee must themselves be free of the slightest taint of corruption. Like Caesar's wife, they must be above suspicion. Unfortunately they are not. That is why Sonia Gandhi, Kapil Sibal, Oily Moily, Digvijay Singh, Manish Tiwari, Abhishek Singvi and other paid and unpaid vermin of that filthy and stinking PVT.Ltd. Co. called Sonia Congress fully owned by Sonia Gandhi ----a private property she seized from the tottering and collapsing hands of decrepit Sitaram Kesari in 1998.

THE DHARMAYUDH OF BABA RAMDEV FOR THE CREATION OF CORRUPTION FREE BHARAT VARSH

BABA RAMDEV HAS MADE A VERY BOLD, REVOLUTIONARY AND PATH-BREAKING ANNOUNCEMENT TO THE EFFECT THAT HE IS LAUNCHING THE BIGGEST STAYAGRAH IN THE HISTORY OF INDIA (EVEN THE WORLD) ON 4TH JUNE 2011 IN NEW DELHI TO FORCE THE RULERS TO TAKE 5 IMMEDIATE STEPS TO END THE CORRUPTION. IN THIS OVER 5 LAKH PEOPLE FROM ALL OVER INDIA AND ABROAD WILL PARTICIPATE AND OVER ONE LAKH PEOPLE ARE EXPECTED TO FAST WITH BABAJI UNTIL THEIR DEMANDS ARE ACCEPTED.


The minimum, irreducible, demands to be made of the government to battle corruption are the following:


1. Pass the Jan Lok Pal Bill by August 2011
2. Issue immediately, a Presidential Ordinance to nationalise wealth held abroad in tax havens by Indian nationals and demand restitution of illicit wealth back into Bharat
3. Abolish participatory notes immediately
4. Set up within a month, Special Investigation Team under SC supervision to get back black moneys stashed abroad


I HAVE NO DOUBT WHAT SO EVER THAT IF THESE DEMANDS ARE NOT MET BY THE GOVERNMENT, BABA RAMDEV WOULD NOT HESITATE TO CALL FOR A JAIL BHARO PHASE OF THE ANTI-CORRUPTION MOVEMENT (BHRASHTHACHAR BUND KARO).


BABA RAMDEV has launched a great revolution to liberate BHARAT VARSH from the draconian tyranny of Sonia Congress and the strangling corruption of Firangi Memsahib and her royal family from Italy. This revolution is as natural a growth as a BANAYAN TREE. Its foundations were laid far back. It has cone out of the crimes, follies and tragedies of the past. I want this BABA RAMDEV REVOLUTION AGAINST HIMALAYAN CORRUPTION IN BHARAT VARSH TO SUCCEED MAGNIFICENTLY. BABA RAMDEV AS THE SUPREMO OF THIS MOVEMENT SHOULD TAKE PARTICULAR CARE TO SEE THAT THE EVER OVERWHELMING PRESSURE OF MEDIOCRITY, SELF-SERVING SELFISHNESS AND HYPOCRISY, SLUGGISH AND INDOMITABLE AS A GLACIER, IS NOT ALLOWED TO FRUSTRATE OR DEPRESS OR HALT THE ONWARD MARCH OF THIS MOST HISTORIC AND EXALTED REVOLUTION. BHARAT MATA KI JAI!

Friday, April 22, 2011

GIGANTIC FRAUD ANNA HAZARE,
AND GARGANTUAN FRAUD SONIA & THE SHADY CIVIL SOCIETY GROUP-I
V.SUNDARAM I.A.S.




TWO SIDES OF THE SAME COIN

I had in my earlier article THE CORRUPT SONIA AND SUBVERSIVE SONIA CONGRESS WORKING WHOLE-TIME TO CRUSH THE BHARAT SWABHIMAN ANDOLAN OF BABA RAMDEV yesterday (20-4-2011) said that all true Nationalists and patriots must view Baba Ramdev and Anna Hazare as two sides of the same coin of our National Movement against the overseeing, overweening and overarching Stone Umbrella of massive corruption of the Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi, her half-breed clan and their lackeys who work whole time for a ‘Private Limited Company’ (called Sonia Congress) wholly owned by Sonia Gandhi and her family. THE ANTI-NATIONAL MAFIA OF MASS MEDIA --- BOTH PRINT AND ELECTRONIC --- do not want to accept this known fact or uphold this position. They are all committed to the philosophy of Sonia Congress gagged fully paid journalism!!


I ADMIT WITH HUMILITY THAT I COULD NOT HAVE BEEN MORE WRONG !!! Like the naïve and  illiterate masses of India, I was also foolishly taken in by the cleverly manipulated projection of Anna Hazare by the Sonia Congress controlled and directed Mafia Of Mass Media as a man of great purity and character, a great Gandhian wearing a Gandhi cap and as a fearless crusader who has gone on a selfless fast unto death and launched a national movement against corruption in India.

Anna Hazare’s spiritual and political mentor Mahatma Gandhi had stated as follows when he called off the Civil Disobedience Movement after the Chauri Chaura Massacre on February 4, 1922: “Whenever I make any mistake, I would not hesitate to retrace my steps and to claim from the house top that I was wrong. It was a HIMALAYAN BLUNDER”.

Taking my lesson from Mahatma Gandhi today I also wish to say that I have made an unpardonable and Capital Mistake in equating an unreliable character called Anna Hazare with very shady antecedents with BABA RAMDEV. Till today I was not aware of the fact that Anna Hazare had been publicly indicted and reprimanded by the JUSTICE PB SAWANT COMMISSION OF INQUIRY ORDERED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA A FEW YEARS AGO. AFTER READING THIS Report I can say that Anna Hazare is as much a walky-talky fraud as Sonia Gandhi, Pranab Mukherjee, P Chidambaram, ‘Oily’ Moily, Kapil Sibal, Digvijay Singh and other supremely corrupt subalterns nay saboteurs of the Private Army of Sonia Gandhi called the SONIA CONGRESS!

The Mafia of Mass Media has cleverly hidden from Public View the finding of the Justice PB Sawant Commission Report that “The expenditure of Rs 2.20 lacs from the funds of the Hind Swaraj Trust for the birthday celebrations of Shri Hajare was clearly illegal and amounted to a corrupt practice.” (p 365). Justice P.B.Sawant was a Supreme Court Judge and he has given his finding in an objective and fair manner.

Thus Anna Hazare, the biter has been bitten by his own accumulated baggage of corruption duly identified, fixed and indicted by the Justice Sawant Commission in 2005. In my view like most other corrupt Sonia Congressmen, Anna Hazare sports a Gandhi Cap. This by itself does not make him a Gandhian.

The Justice Sawant commission set up by Government of Maharashtra in 2003 “to probe into the allegations of corrupt practices and maladministration into matters of allegations of corruption against several state ministers and social activist Anna Hazare” clearly indicted the Magsaysay Awardee ANNA HAZARE. The report submitted on February 23, 2005, concludes: “The expenditure of Rs 2.20 lacs from the funds of the Hind Swaraj Trust for the birthday celebrations of Shri Hajare was clearly illegal and amounted to a corrupt practice.” (p 365)

Sant Yadavbaba Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, a Trust with which Hazare is associated since its inception in 1980, “committed illegalities” in its audits, according to Justice Sawant.”

Justice Sawant Report says, “There is no doubt that the trust, and therefore, the trustees of the trust committed illegalities.” (p 281)

According to Justice Sawant Report, Ganpatrao Avati,a close associate of Hazare, had asked for an amount of Rs 25,000 to process an application. It thus inferseven those activists who were nearer to Shri Hajare were indulging in corruption and demanding money from the supplicants who came for relief from Shri Hajare.” (p 359-60) In my view all the social activists (representing different NGOs who owe their personal indivisible allegiance to Sonia Gandhi who are encircling Anna Hazare are no different from Ganpatrao Avati and are all different species of the larger genus extolled by the Mafia of Mass Media---both Print And Electronic---as CIVIL SOCIETY! Their criminality---individually, severally and collectively---is too well known and fully documented. Let me give some more details to prove my point!

REPORT OF THE JUSTICE PB SAWANT COMMISSION OF INQUIRY 2005

The Commission inquired into complaints against Shri Hazare and his NGOs and found as follows:

Hind Swaraj Trust:
p.269 - illegalities and maladministration in land transactions
p.271 - illegal utilisation of the trust's funds

Sant Yadavbaba Shikshan Prasarak Mandal:
p.281 - "committed illegalities" - its audited accounts for 1982 to 1994 were filed in 1995 and for 1995 to 2002 in 2003. 
p.285 - legal requirement flouted from 1985 at least till 2005 of submission of the annual budget to the Charity Commissioner p.297 - did not list all its properties as legally required to the Charity Commissioner
pp. 298-99 - did not have its accounts in scheduled banks as required by the law, it advanced a loan that was illegal, it spent money on objects outside its charter 
p.304 - maladministration 
p.305 - illegalities in regard to a fixed deposit

Bhrashtachar Virodhi Jan Andolan Trust:
p.316 - registered contrary to law 
pp.319-21 - at least since 1998 onwards to 2005 the trust was not functioning legally 
p.323 - from 10/11/2001 the accounts were not maintained as per the rules of the trust
p.323 - donations collected in the name of the trust were not properly receipted nor were accounted for in it 
p.326 - audited accounts were not submitted to the Charity Commissioner for 1998-2002  
p.327 - illegal cash transctions were made
pp.329-30 - Hazare made key appointments illegally, and these appointees "lost" money collected by them
pp.359-61 - "activists" close to Hazare took bribes from supplicants to Hazare, and Hazare did not act against these "activists"

Krishna Pani Puravatha Yojana Sahakari Sanstha:
p.363 - Hazare a member when not eligible to be one.

Main Conclusions of Justice Sawant Commission Report:
p.365 - the Commission summarized illegality/corruption/maladministration by Hazare/his NGOs..

The Commision noted "punishable" illegalities.  It is not readily clear that anyone was punished for them.

Justice P.B. Sawant said that What I probed was certainly a case of corruption. But Hazare accepted that it was a mistake...."

When an accused admits his guilt before a Magistrate in a Court of Law, he makes the task of the Magistrate easier because all that is left for him is to fix the sentence to be awarded to the accused under the Law. Under the Indian Evidence Act, when an accused openly admits his guilt in a Court of Law, it requires no corroboration what so ever from any other independent witness. The basic principle of jurisprudence is that no man will admit against himself. Anna Hazare has openly admitted his mistake to Justice P.B.Sawant.

However, as Justice P.B.Sawant was only heading a Commission of Enquiry, he has given his finding against Anna Hazare. In my view Anna Hazare is as much guilty of brazen corruption as Sonia Gandhi and her equally corrupt Union Cabinet Ministers.

The scale and scope and magnitude of Anna Hazare’s  Corruption may be radically and structurally different from that of the Himalayan Corruption of Sonia Gandhi. But this is irrelevant. Both of them are different sides of the same coin of venal and vicious corruption plaguing the country today. Desi Anna Hazare (with his dubious Gandhi Cap!)  has no more moral authority than the Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi (despite the suffix of controversial ‘Gandhi’ to her name, because neither she nor her late husband has any connection with Mahatma Gandhi!).

I am not therefore surprised that Anna Hazare (as informally desired or ‘directed’ by Sonia Gandhi!) chose to write as follows to the defacto Hitler type dictator Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi, THE GANGOTRI OF ALL CORRUPTION on April 18th 2011:


Mrs Sonia Gandhi,


Chairperson, UPA,


10, Janpath, New Delhi


Dear Mrs Gandhi
We entered the joint committee with the hope of jointly drafting a strong anti-corruption law for the country. Your letter to me, just a day before I ended my fast, that ‘there is an urgent necessity of combating graft and corruption in public life’ and that ‘the law in these matters must be effective and deliver the desired results’, was reassuring.
However, the developments of the last few days have been a cause for concern. It seems that the corrupt forces in the country have united to derail the process of drafting an effective anti-corruption law through the joint committee. Together we have to defeat their designs. (Are not Anna Hazare  and Sonia Gandhi two sides of the SAME COIN OF CORRUPTION by prior subterranean arrangement and agreement!?!)
One of their strategies is to smear the reputations of the civil society members in the committee.
Whereas I am of the view that the people working for public must be subjected to public scrutiny, however, when blatantly false accusations are made, fabricated CDs are planted, then one feels that the purpose is not an honest public scrutiny but to tarnish reputations.
THEY HAVE NOT EVEN SPARED ME, EVEN THOUGH I HAVE LIVED A SIMPLE LIFE FOLLOWING ON THE PATH OF TRUTH.
However, I am happy that despite all their efforts, the vested interests could not dig out anything of substance. This has only raised the reputations of civil society members in the eyes of public. The smear campaign of vested interests seems to be back firing.
People can see through what is happening. We are receiving many messages from the people expressing solidarity and sending wishes from across the country that the vested interests have struck back and we should not give up.
I was wondering what would be the outcome if the government nominees in the committee were subjected to similar scrutiny or witch hunt.
Those in power have much more to explain. However, we don’t want to divert the attention of the people from Lokpal Bill to individual mud-slinging, which seems to be the objective of the people behind this smear campaign.
One of the general secretaries of the Congress Party has been making many statements in the press in the last one week. I assume that he has the support of the party to make such remarks.
Most of these statements are factually wrong, which makes one believe whether his only intention is to create confusion, mislead people and derail the ongoing discussions in joint committee. Do you personally approve of his statements?
After the joint committee meeting, one of the ministers addressed the press saying that the meeting was good.
Subsequently, according to many friends in media, he held a private ‘informal debriefing session’ at his house and falsely accused us of having succumbed to government’s pressure within the committee and that we had diluted the law.
This was a completely false statement because there were no discussions at all on the law within the committee.
His “informal debriefing” created confusions in the minds of the people across the country.
It appears that his debriefing was meant to send a message to the public that we had been “influenced”.
We had apprehended such mischievous conduct and that is the reason we have been demanding video recordings of the proceedings and their release immediately after each meeting.
India has suffered immensely due to corruption. This is a historic moment when the whole country seems to have come together to demand effective action against corruption.
I would urge you to advise your colleagues not to try to derail the process of drafting the law. The country is in no mood to wait any longer to have strong anti-corruption law.
People are very agitated. I fear of the consequences if the process were derailed.
Warm regards,
Sd/-
(K.B. Hazare)

I am very amused to see that the Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi has sent a letter to Anna Hazare to the effect that she is as serious about fighting corruption as Anna Hazare.  I am giving below the full text of Sonia Gandhi’s letter to Anna Hazare dated 21st April 2011:













Sonia Gandhi's letter to Anna Hazare
Updated: April 20, 2011 19:11 IST


New Delhi:  UPA chairperson and Congress President Sonia Gandhi has written to social activist Anna Hazare reiterating her support for the Lokpal Bill and her commitment to fight against corruption.


I do not support or encourage politics of smear campaign," Sonia Gandhi wrote in her letter.



Here's the full letter:



Dear Anna Hazare ji,


Thank you for your letter of April 18, 2011.

Let me reiterate what I wrote to you earlier, that I believe there is an urgent necessity to combat graft and corruption. You should have no doubt of my commitment in the fight for probity in public life. I strongly support the institution of a Lokpal that is consistent with the practices and conventions of our parliamentary democracy.

The Lokpal Bill was very much a part of the agenda of NAC. As you know the NAC working group on transparency, accountability and governance under the convenership of Ms Aruna Roy held consultations on this subject on April 4 with several representatives of civil society including Shri Shanti Bhushan, Shri Santosh Hegde and Shri Prashant Bhushan who are now on the joint committee, as well as Swami Agnivesh and Shri Arvind Kejriwal, who have been closely associated with you. The working group had decided to hold further consultations and evolve broad principles for discussion and approval in the next meeting of the NAC scheduled for April 28.

In fact in your letter of April 8, which my office received at around noon on that date, you yourself said:

"I wish to bring to your notice that the sub-committee of your NAC has agreed with the broad content of Jan Lokpal bill, barring two issues, after extensive discussions on April 4 with various knowledgeable sections of society.

"May I request you to kindly get the draft discussed at full meeting of NAC at the earliest and recommend the outcome to the government"

As I have just mentioned, this is the very course that the NAC was following until the process was, as you know, overtaken by subsequent events.

As for statements appearing in the media, let me assure you that I do not support nor encourage the politics of smear campaigns.

With good wishes,

Yours sincerely,

Sonia Gandhi


Thus Anna Hazare has thawed and melted and bowed before this fraudulent gesture of political coquetry of the Firangi Memsahib and has told the Press with smug self satisfaction “Soniaji has sent a letter to me and told me that she is with me in my fight against corruption.”

Firangi Memsahib wants to use Anna Hazare to counter the Anti-Corrption Drive of BHARAT SWABHIMAN ANDOLAN OF BABA RAMDEV which has become an overwhelming and elemental National Force against de-nationalization of Bharat and her culture and all forms of Sonia Congress sponsored corruption in India’s public life. In turn Anna Hazare wants to use the strangling influence of Sonia Gandhi over the Mafia of Mass Media to gain the maximum publicity for himself and also to use her political clout to gain maximum financial advantage for the NGO sharks like Arvind Kejriwal, Medha Patkar, and Swami Agnivesh and Mallika Sarabhai. Thus we can Sonia Gandhi is for Anna Hazare and Anna Hazare is for Sonia Gandhi. The underground functional link between the two is provided by the coterie (nay noose!) of murky social activists surrounding Anna Hazare. Recently Digvijay Singh, as directed by Sonia Gandhi, had openly suggested that Anna Hazare should take in Aruna Roy and Harsh Mander as Civil Society members of the Jan Lokpal Bill Drafting Committee!


What is the basis for the romantic fascination of Anna Hazare for the murky, murkier and murkiest members of the NAC headed by Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi? The answer to this question becomes more mysterious because in the website of India Against Corruption (IAC) headed by Anna Hazare and his chosen team of NGOs (shady social activists), and also in the website http://truthaboutindiacorruption.org/all the corrupt deeds of Sonia Gandhi have been fully documented! What is most startling and intriguing is that on page 7 of  http://truthaboutindiacorruption.org/, we can see the allegations of Dr.Subramaniam Swamy that Sonia’s two sisters Anushka and Nadia have had a share in the total loot of Sonia Gandhi in the 2G Spectrum Scam.  To see all this exciting stuff:


2) Just click http://www.indiaagainstcorruption.org/aboutus.html; the colour photos of the crusaders led by Anna Hazare spearheading the movement against corruption will appear. They are the hope for a corruption-free India today.

3) Click http://www.indiaagainstcorruption.info/scams and the scams detailed earlier, in which Sonia Gandhi and her family and personal and political friends figure prominently, will appear.


Sonia Gandhi wants to defraud Anna Hazare. Anna Hazare and his team want to defraud Sonia Gandhi no less. Both these groups are united in their resolve to defeat the Bharat Swabhiman Andolan Movement of Baba Ramdev and in the process cheat and dispossess the myriad millions of India. In this criminal drama the Anti-National Mafia Of Mass Media is cooperating with élan and gusto!!


Anna Hazare and his team of Social Activists cannot say that they are unaware of the recent letter sent by Dr.Subramaniam Swamy to the Prime Minister on April 16th seeking his sanction to prosecute Firangi Memsahib under the Prevention of Corruption Act!!! This Civil Society Conglomerate of organized fraudsters are all ‘plants’ of Sonia Gandhi. That is why Gandhi Cap Anna Hazare (by no means Gandhian!) seems to wax eloquent in eulogizing the sham initiatives of the Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi to create a Corruption Free India!

DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY SEEKS SANCTION OF THE P.M. TO "PROSECUTE SONIA GANDHI"
Saturday, April 16, 2011 10:42 AM
From:

April 15,2011


PRESS RELEASE


Dr.Subramanian Swamy, Janata Party President and former Union Cabinet Minister for Law &Justice, today submitted a Petition of 206 pages, seeking from the Prime Minister Dr.Manmohan Singh the required Sanction to prosecute Ms. Sonia Gandhi under Sections 11 & 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Sanction is required under Section 19 of the Act because she is Chairperson of the National Advisory Council with Cabinet rank.

In his Petition to the PM, Dr.Swamy has made out a prima facie case on documentary circumstantial evidence that Ms.Gandhi abetted Italian businessman and close family friend Ottavio Quattrocchi to obtain an illegal commission in the Bofors Gun Purchase deal, and then influenced the government of Prime Minister Narasimha Rao to enable Mr. Quattrocchi to escape from the country in July 1993. Thereafter she directed the Union Law Minister in 2005 to enable Mr. Quattrocchi to get his London accounts de-frozen and decamp scot free with over $ 200 million [about Rs 1000 crores].

Dr.Swamy has also made out a prima facie case that Mr. Gandhi has illegally held in Swiss bank accounts illegal monies of about Rs. 10,000 crores received as a legatee in 1991 following Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination.

He also produced an admission on record of the spokesperson of the Russian government that KGB had provided funds to Ms. Gandhi and her family, as also evidence that she had received commissions on Indo-Soviet trade, which were illegal under Indian law.

In his Petition, Dr.Swamy has also catalogued a list of offences prima facie committed by Ms.Sonia Gandhi since 1974 which shows that she is an habitual offender who deserves to be prosecuted and punished.