Follow by Email

Total Pageviews

CURRENT ARTICLES OF V. SUNDARAM (JANUARY 2010 ONWARDS)

Monday, July 9, 2012

Pranab Mukherjee -

The Continuing Saga

of Perfidious

Perjury and Forgery



By V. SUNDARAM I.A.S


The Italian Vishakanya Sonia Gandhi, the fraudster Pranab Mukherjee and the other thugs in the Sonia Congress High Command are wedded to the ideology that a high sense of honour is virulently communal and any kind of reprehensible mis-conduct which brings nothing but national and international disgrace to the Nation, apart from causing an irreparable injury to the National Exchequer, is truly secular, progressive, suavely refined and cosmopolitan.

Now to come to the allegation of forgery raised against Pranab Mukherjee by the BJP and others. In my view, Pranab Mukherjee can be charged with the offences of both FORGERY and CLEVER FORGERY as defined by a Supreme Court Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice R.V Ravindran and Hon’ble Justice H.L Gokhale in their Judgment on 3rd August 2010 in Appeal (Civil) 6207 of 2010. In their Judgment they stated: “If a false signature is very different from the real signature, and is easily identifiable, it will be a FORGERY but not a CLEVER FORGERY.” I am calling it a CLEVER FORGERY because the Resignation Letter of 20th June 2012 bears a Forged Signature of Pranab Mukherjee on Finance Minister’s Letterhead without any Office Seal of either the Finance Ministry or the Office of the ISI Director Professor MGK Menon who illegally ‘Accepted’ Pranab Mukherjee’s Resignation in a wholly unauthorised and unapproved manner. If Professor MGK Menon, President of the ISI, is duly authorised to accept the Resignation Letter of Pranab Mukherjee, then I would like to ask as to whether Pranab Mukherjee or Professor MGK Menon can at least produce 3 other Letters of Resignation from other individuals holding High Offices in the ISI which were accepted by Professor MGK Menon. If so, why were they not produced by Pranab Mukherjee’s Agents like Chidambaram and Bhansal before the Returning Officer on the 3rd of July 2012. I am not for a moment demanding such 3 other instances of Resignation Letters must also relate to individuals with the same murky track record of Pranab Mukherjee!

The Returning Officer for the 2012 Presidential Poll Agnihotri has rejected the objections raised by Satya Pal Jain, Advocate for P.A Sangma that Pranab Mukherjee has to be disqualified on the ground that he was holding an Office of Profit in his capacity as the Chairman of the Indian Statistical Institute (ISI) on the day on which he filed his Nomination Papers for the Office of the President of India.

A more serious objection raised by him relates to the fact that the Resignation Letter dated 20th June 2012, furnished by Pranab Mukherjee, is clearly an afterthought. This apart, it bears a signature of Pranab Mukherjee, which has been definitely forged.

Without applying his mind the concerned Returning Officer summarily rejected the Objections raised by Satya Pal Jain, the Advocate for P.A Sangma. Against the patently illegal and immoral decision of the RO, a 3 Member Delegation consisting of Dr Subramanian Swamy, Satya Pal Jain Advocate for P.A Sangma and BJP Leader, Bhartruhari Mahtab Parliamentary Leader of BJD Party in the Lok Sabha met the Chief Election Commissioner V.S Sampath at 11 AM today (Saturday, the 7th of July 2012) and made the following complaints against the Returning Officer.

A. The total Failure of the Returning Officer to verify the signature of Pranab Mukherjee on his Letter of Resignation dated 20th June from the Office of Profit of the Chairman of the ISI. Even a schoolboy in a primary school who compares the Signature of Pranab Mukherjee in the Resignation Letter with the Signature of Pranab Mukherjee on his Nomination Papers can see the golf of difference between the two Signatures. Thus a fraud of FORGERY has been committed by Pranab Mukherjee or one of his Madame Pampadours or Rasputins acting on his behalf. This has to be verified by a Forensic Expert who is not in the pay of the Italian Vishakanya’s Party!B. Pranab Mukherjee is still holding 2 more Offices of Profit which disqualifies him from holding the Office of the President of India. They are,
a. Vice President, Birbhum Institute of Engineering and Technology and
b. Chairman, Rabindra Bharti Society,
     which forms the Rabindra Bharti University.

The 3 Member Delegation, which met the Chief Election Commissioner V.S Sampath this morning invited his attention to the offences of perjury and forgery committed by Pranab Mukherjee and sought his intervention under Article 324 of the Indian Constitution, which makes it mandatory for the Chief Election Commissioner to exercise SUPERINTENDENCE, DIRECTION and CONTROL of the Electoral Process relating to the Presidential Poll.

Only by firm and effective intervention by the Chief Election Commissioner, without any fear or favour at this stage, can the patent injustice done to P.A Sangma by the Returning Officer Dr Vivek Kumar Agnihotri be corrected without causing any further grievous and mortal injury to our Nation.

Now the ball is in the court of the Chief Election Commissioner V.S Sampath who has requested the 3 Member Delegation consisting of Dr Subramanian Swamy, Satya Pal Jain and Bhartruhari Mahtab to make their Written Submissions by the evening of Monday the 9th of July 201.

IN MY VIEW the Returning officer Dr Vivek Kumar Agnihotri should be severly reprimanded by the Chief Election Commissioner for his blatant failure to discharge his allotted responsibilities which has resulted in an indefensible miscarriage of justice to the democratic electoral process sanctified by our Constitution.

With bated breath we have to await the decision of the Chief Election Commissioner V.S Sampath on the complaints made by the 3 Member Delegation. T.N Sheshan was the first and the only Chief Election Commissioner who succeeded in Constitutionally taming all our raw, raucous, venal and unscrupulous politicians.It remains to be seen whether V.S Sampath discharges in a bold and fearless, manner, the Constitutional Duties cast upon him under Article 324 of the Indian Constitution. It will be very interesting to see whether V.S Sampath is a run-of-the-mill, listless, lifeless, soulless, supine Sonia-worshipping Bureaucrat like Navin Chawla or whether he will, for a healthy change, turn out to be as bold, courageous and truthful as T.N Sheshan of yesteryears.




2 comments:

Kavitha Reddy said...

Wonderful words. Wisdom examplified. I am bookmarking this. Please keep posting such nice thoughts.

Best Regards,
Kavitha

Kavitha Reddy said...

Wonderful words. Wisdom examplified. I am bookmarking this. Please keep posting such nice thoughts.

Best Regards,
Kavitha