Follow by Email

Total Pageviews

CURRENT ARTICLES OF V. SUNDARAM (JANUARY 2010 ONWARDS)

Friday, March 8, 2013

Congress Party

Alleges

"Saffron Terror"

– Part 2

GANDHI’S CONTEMPT FOR HINDUS AND HINDUISM


by V. Sundaram I.A.S (retd.)
          All India General Secretary (Ideology), Janata Party
     And
  Praveen Shanker Pillai


In my earlier article I had mentioned that on the one hand the Sonia Congress Union Home Ministers always allege “Hindu Terror” without any scruple of conscience and without proving any case of “Hindu Terror” in a Court of Law, and on the other hand the Congress Party takes care to distance itself safely from such anti-National remarks following every public uproar. This is a distinct, discernable and repeating pattern of Congress double game based on hatred for Hindus and Sanatana Dharma and unrequited love for the belligerent Muslims both in India and in Pakistan.

Union Home Minister Sushil Kumar Shinde accused the BJP and the RSS of fanning “Hindu Terrorism” while speaking at the AICC meeting in Jaipur on Sunday, 20th January 2013. Sushil Shinde made this unsubstantiated accusation in the presence of Sonia Gandhi and her beloved son Rahul Gandhi. Neither Sonia Gandhi nor Rahul Gandhi have disavowed and condemned the “Hindu terrorism” slur and apologized for it. So, one may safely assume that these alien Abrahamic Rulers have allowed their chattels in the Congress Party and puppets in the Union Cabinet of Ministers to make these wild accusations, which are in tune with their Nehru-Gandhi Family’s Islamic-Christian contempt and hatred for Hindus and for Sanatana Dharma.

Nehru-Gandhi Family’s Islamic-Christian contempt and hatred for Hindus and for Sanatana Dharma can be traced to the ORIGINAL and GENUINE GANDHI’s contempt for Hindus and the sadistic manner with which he treated them.

But what accounts for Gandhi’s contempt for Hindus?

Let me quote from ‘Gandhi's Muslim Appeasement’ By Dr Radhasyam Brahmachari: “It is now well known that Muslim appeasement was an inseparable part of Gandhi’s quack doctrine of Non-violence. But many do not know why he adopted, or was compelled to adopt this dirty policy, while he was in South Africa, in 1908. At that time the South African government imposed an unjust tax of £ 3 on every Indian living in South Africa and Gandhi initiated talks with South African government on this matter. But the Muslims did not support this move and were displeased with Gandhi. In addition to that Gandhi, on one occasion, made some critical comments on Islam while he was speaking at a gathering. Furthermore, he tried to make a comparative estimate of Hinduism, Islam and Christianity, which made the Muslims furious.”

“A few days later, on 10th February 1908, a group of Muslims under the leadership of a Pathan called Mir Alam entered Gandhi’s house and beat him mercilessly. When Gandhi fell on the ground the Muslim attackers kicked him right and left and beat him with sticks. They also threatened to kill him. From this incident onward, Gandhi stopped making any critical comment on Muslims or Islam. According to Dr. B.R. Ambedkar, this incident was a milestone in Gandhi’s life and afterwards Gandhi began to overlook even the most heinous crime committed by the Muslims.” Thus Gandhi lived with a life-long mortal fear of Muslim violence. The fear-stricken Gandhi turned into a fanatic and frenzied Muslim appeaser.

FEAR-STRICKEN PEOPLE’S TRIBUTE TO OPPRESSION IS HYPOCRISY. Hypocrisy made Gandhi find sophisticated and convoluted excuses for his submissive behaviour to the violent Muslim oppressor. Gandhi hid his cowardice under the quack doctrine of Non-Violence, which he took care only to preach to the Hindus and never to the Muslim “Brothers”. He believed himself liberal but was on actual fact afraid of Muslims and he consistently pleaded for the Muslims and pampered them.
(‘Anti-Hindus’, by Prafull Goradia and K.R.Phanda. Contemporary Targett Prafull Private Limited, pages 4, 5.)

To quote the appropriate words of Prafull Goradia in this context: “For Gandhi, no price was too great for appeasing Muslims, so that they did not oppose Hindus. That he did not understand the Muslims was proved by the conduct of the Muslim League and by the vivisection of the country.”

Gandhi preached Non-Violence, Secularism and Sacrifices in the name of Hindu-Muslim Amity, only to the unthinking, gullible and ‘devout’ Hindu victims who referred to him with great reverence as the ‘Mahatma’, and never to their savage Muslim oppressors.

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi taught the Hindus that the erstwhile Muslim invaders were not the enemy of the Hindus. Hindus and Muslim were brothers and had to unite to drive out the British from India at any cost. His obsession for Hindu-Muslim unity knew no limits. However, the Muslims of India during the days of British Rule treated Mahatma Gandhi as a Kaffir. The most clinching evidence for this observation can be derived from the fact that Maulana Mohammad Ali of Khilafat Agitation Fame declared categorically at a public meeting in Aligarh in 1924: “However pure Mr Gandhi’s character may be, he must appear to me from the point of view of religion inferior to any Mussalman, even though he be without any character.” A year later when he was questioned at a public meeting in Lucknow, he reiterated with unusual candour: “Yes, according to my religion and creed, I do hold an adulterous and a fallen Mussalman to be better than Mahatma Gandhi.”

No personal insult or abuse from the Muslims and no treasonable acts of the Muslims, by the Muslims and for the Muslims ever deterred 'Maulana' Mahatma Gandhi from his life-mission of Muslim-appeasement at all costs, in spite of all Islamic terror and however long, hard and bloody the road seemed to be for the battered Hindus of India.

Gandhi’s impotent rage provoked by his Muslim oppressors, turned into self-hate. In his later years, he widened this self-hate to encompass the larger Hindu community to which he belongs. Gandhi started regarding, with contempt, the Hindu society, which could not and did not protect him in Africa, despite all his piety, when the Muslims attacked him on 10th February 1908. Therefore he became cold-bloodedly neutral and indifferent towards the trials and tribulations of the Hindus. This anti-Hindu posture, the seeds of which were sown in 1908 in South Africa, grew more and more virulent after he came to India in January 1915 and lasted in an ‘epidemic’ fashion till the last day of his life. This anti-Hindu tradition was assiduously fostered by ‘Maulana’ Jawaharlal Nehru after our Independence year after year and continued by Indira Gandhi and the Congress Party ever since.

Given below are some quotations from the book HINDU DHARMA by M.K Gandhi to show the twisted and warped, tortuous and treacherous heart and mind of Gandhi. Gandhi’s quotations given below are drawn from the above book have all been put in CAPITAL LETTERS.

“YOU WILL FIND IN HISTORY CASES OF INJUSTICE DONE BY MUSLIMS. BUT THEIR RELIGION IS A NOBLE ONE AND THE MUSLIMS ARE A NOBLE PEOPLE. I, THEREFORE, ADVICE EVERY HINDU TO PLACE HIS FULL TRUST IN HIS MUSLIM BRETHREN.” [Hindu Dharma by Gandhi. Orient Paperbacks. Pg 54,55]

“But suppose that Muslims betray Hindus despite the latter’s generous behaviour?”
To quote Gandhi: “WE HAVE MADE NO SINCERE EFFORTS TO BRING ABOUT HINDU-MUSLIM UNITY.”

“Will, HINDUS, in that case remain cowards?”
To quote Gandhi: “I DO NOT MEAN THAT HINDUS SHOULD HELP BECAUSE OF THEIR OWN WEAKNESS, BUT THAT IT HAS BECOME OUR DUTY TO HELP THE MUSLIMS AS NEIGHBOURS SINCE THEIR CASE IS JUST AND THE MEANS THEY ARE EMPLOYING ARE ALSO JUST.”

So, when the ‘Muslim brother’ rape-warrior comes calling next time, to satiate his Islamic lust and carnal desire for Hindu women, Gandhi expects our “Passive Resistor” Hindu householder to perform the dominated, oppressed and suppressed “kaffir’s” “DUTY TO HELP THE MUSLIM”, by handing over his Hindu daughters to the Muslim rapist, since, according to Gandhi, the Islamic domination of Hindu Kaffirs
is “JUST” and the Islamic “MEANS” of rape and loot of Hindus “ARE ALSO JUST”.
To quote Gandhi: “IF THEY DO NOT DO THIS DUTY, THEY WILL STRENGTHEN THE BONDS OF SLAVERY AND LOSE FOR EVER THE OPPORTUNITY OF WINNING THE FRIENDSHIP OF MUSLIMS. DOING IT, THEY WILL SHAKE OFF SLAVERY AND WIN OVER THE MUSLIMS.”

To see the Hindu-Muslim relationship from an Islamic point of view let us refer to Altaf Hussein Hali (1834-1914). He is an Islamic poet whose famous poem called ‘MUSSADAS’, is a required reading in many Pakistani schools. In this poem Altaf Hussein Hali lamented as follows in stanza # 113.


      Voh Din e Hijazi ka bebaak bera
      Nishan jis ka aksay alam me pahuncha
      Mazhaam hua koi khatra no jis ka
      Na Oman me thithka Na Qulzum (Red Sea) me jijhka
      Kiye paar jis ne saton sumundar
      Voh duba dahane me Ganga ke akar


    "That fearless fleet of Hijaz (Bagdad),
    Whose mark reached the extreme limits of the World
    Which no hesitation could obstruct
    Which did not falter in the Gulf of Oman or in the Red Sea
    That Hijazi fleet which spanned the seven seas
    Lies shattered in the mouth of the Ganga!"

Winning the friendship of those whose fearless fleets we have already shattered?
Gandhi, obviously, did not know the strength of the Hindus!
Gandhi did not know that Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj defeated Muslim armies in 1660s, two decades before Europe defeated the Turks at The Gates of Vienna in 1683.
Gandhi did not know that Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s Sikh army commanded by General Hari Singh Nalwa captured Multan and Peshawar from the Afghans. Great was the fear that General Hari Singh Nalwa created in the Afghan Population. That fear became so deeply ingrained in the Afghan psyche that Afghan women would frighten their children to sleep by saying ‘sleep, otherwise Hari Singh will come’.

Gandhi, the CRYPTO-MUSLIM, who ably marketed himself, as a pious Hindu who had renounced the world in the hoary Hindu traditions, believed and preached that every Hindu is fettered by “BONDS OF SLAVERY” and that only a craven submission to the Muslims will lead to Hindu emancipation and liberation from slavery. Gandhi’s language was uncannily similar to the local Muslim Madrassa teacher!

Gandhi wrote: "Hindus are cowards and Muslims are bullies." A large number of Hindus themselves accept this cliché. Indian History does not bear out the conclusion that "Hindus are cowards". In this 150th Birth Anniversary of Swami Vivekananda, I cannot help comparing Gandhi’s slavish attitude, words and deeds, which stand in sharp contrast to that of the Patriot-Monk of India, Swami Vivekananda who always addressed his Hindu Brethren as “CHILDREN OF IMMORTALITY” flooding their hearts and minds with leonine pride in their ancient faith, Sanatana Dharma and self-less devotion to the ancient Hindu Nation.

Ref:
1.Excerpts from GANDHI and NEHRU -- Betrayers of BHARATVARSHA by V. Sundaram. Wednesday, March 10, 2010
http://ennapadampanchajanya.blogspot.in/2010/03/gandhi-and-nehru-betrayers-nay.html

2.Coward Hindus or Failed Islam
By Dr. M. Lal Goel, 02-01-2010

http://www.voi.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=332&Itemid=1&limit=1&limitstart=1




No comments: