NOBLE RASCALITY OF RAHUL GANDHI!

V. SUNDARAM I.A.S

Noble rascality may appear to be a contradiction in terms. History is my hobby. I have learnt more from my private study of history than from St Stephen’s College, Delhi where I studied Economics for 5 years from 1953 to 1958. I have derived the title for this article from British period of Indian history. In 1843, the English East India Company attacked Sindh and occupied it like an armed dacoit. Sir Charles Napier (1782-1853), the British General who was in-charge of this unprovoked assault operation, remarked: “We Knew it from the beginning that it was a piece of rascality. If this was a piece of rascality, it was a noble piece of rascality!” Moreover it seems to fall into place because Rahul Gandhi is the great-grandson of Pundit Jawaharlal Nehru who shamelessly declared: “I am a Hindu by accident of birth.” “I am the last Englishman to govern India”.

After the ‘glorious’ and ‘unprecedented victory’ in the recent Assembly elections in Bihar, the ‘Congress High Command (which means the omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient alien born Sonia Gandhi and no one else)’ deputed His Royal Highness to the ‘Saffronized’, ‘Communalism-ridden’, ‘Saffron Terrorism infested’, Gujarat to give his reverberating, rejuvenating and revolutionary political message to the battered and shattered people of Gujarat! Some years ago, his mother, the international stateswoman who is in the run for Nobel Prize for Peace and also for canonization by the Pope in Rome, had covered herself with historic glory by paying her tribute in Hindi, uttered in Italian accent, to Narendra Modi calling him “Maut ka Saudagar” (Merchant of Death). Now the sensational actor ‘Crown Prince’ endowed with every sense other than commonsense has made history by likening Narendra Modi to Mao Tse-Tung. If only Mao Tse-Tung had been alive, he would have dealt with Rahul Gandhi in the same way as he had dealt with his political opponents in China!.

             'Crown Prince' Rahul Gandhi

Rahul Gandhi, after completing his electoral campaign in Bihar which was marked by, malice, vicious small-mindedness, name-calling, slander, calumny and hatred towards Nitish Kumar, went on a three day tour to Gujarat. He addressed three meetings in Ahmedabad, Vadodara and Rajkot. At all his meetings, there is normally a pre-arranged and well orchestrated question hour session organized by slavish Sonia Congressmen to enable the ‘Crown Prince’ endowed with the intellect of a Bertrand Russel, the wisdom of Socrates and the looks of Manmatha to answer questions posed to him by young people with extraordinary speed and grace! Unfortunately for the “Crown Prince’, it was a different and totally unexpected scenario at all his meetings in Gujarat.

Normally at all his meetings, some young men would stand up and pay lavish tributes to His Highness for his noble and lofty qualities of leadership, a rare man in Indian history --- nay, world history ---  cast in a grand mould. But in Ahmedabad Rahul Gandhi was brashly told by the youngsters about Chief Minister Narendra Modis’s grand development agenda for Gujarat and how it had taken Gujarat to unprecedented levels of economic prosperity in the field of agriculture and industry --- large, medium and small. One of the students stood up and asked Rahul Gandhi: “Why are you cavilling against Narendra Modi who has given our nation his unique model for effective governance?  Has he not given to the people of Gujarat a pragmatic model based on the principle of minimum government and maximum governance?”

At the same meeting in Ahmedabad a young girl, with legitimate  and well-merited contempt for the artificially catapulted and exalted status of the ‘Crown Prince’, got into an animated and spirited argument with Rahul Gandhi. She tauntingly asked him: “I challenge you to name Congress leaders who can measure up to Narendra Modi on development work”.

Rahul Gandhi lost his temper and gave this bizarre rejoinder to the students. To those young students who were impressed by Narendra Modi’s ‘minimum Government, maximum governance’1 agenda: the ‘Crown Prince’ exclaimed “Mao also developed China but he caused destruction to the country too.”  One of the enthusiastic and bold young students, refusing to be put down by the ‘Crown Prince’s’ snub, retorted: “You are referring to the Gujarat riots. Both Muslims and Hindus died in that violence.”

Why did the ‘Crown Prince’ Rahul Gandhi go to Gujarat at all? The ‘Crown Prince’ Rahul Gandhi was supposed to come to Chennai and lord it over the electoral ally DMK, after winning 240 out of the 246 seats in the Bihar Assembly elections and after installing a Congress Government there. As the Congress Party got a well-deserved drubbing in Bihar, he could not show his face here in Chennai. The grapevine in New Delhi is abuzz with rumours that he went into a state of mental depression after the Great Bihar Debacle! In order to rouse himself to more dynamic political action and keep his Sonia Congress family business afloat he was advised by his Italian Mama’s advisors that offence is the best form of defense! He was told that the best thing to do is to go to the ‘Saffronized’ Gujarat and continue the glorious tradition of ‘Maut ka Saudagar’ attacks on the ‘Communal’ Narendra Modi, already so well-established by the Mother Superior herself!! And so the Son clinched the ‘Gujarat victory’ soon after the ‘Bihar victory’! Now the shameless and supine 24/7 slaves of the Firangi Memsahib and her Party, like Abhishek Singhvis, Manish Tiwaris, Dwivedis and Jayanti Natarajans would be confabulating with one another to finalize the strategy to take the new ‘message’ of the ‘Crown Prince’ Rahul Gandhi to the masses of India through the Sonia Congress-mafia gagged mass media in India --- both print and electronic.

The students of Ahmedabad deserve to be congratulated by the people of India for having shown great political maturity and understanding by fearlessly ticking off one of the top-most anti-National, anti-social, pro-Islamic, suavely Christian and virulently anti-Hindu Rahul Gandhi. What are his great political credentials to attack Narendra Modi? What are his established national credentials to be the General Secretary of the Congress Party? Is he not there merely because he has been nominated by his firangi mother?

The students of Gujarat were not the first to diagnose, detect and dissect the walkie-talkie fraud and hypocrisy of Rahul Gandhi and his family. Earlier this year, on February 2, 2010 when he went to Darbhanga in Bihar to address the students of Lalit Narayan Mithila University, he had made some uncalled for and wholly unfounded allegations against Narendra Modi. He showed his Italian mother’s foolishness and imperious arrogance when he ranted and raved: “For India to be changed (presumably into the bhooka-nanga Bharat of his dreams) Gujarat needs to be changed first.” Tempers flew and the furious students turned on him. I wish they had dealt him the same treatment which the top congress leader-goons in New Delhi gave to the sitting Congress President Sitaram Kesari. Sitaram Kesari was shoved around and finally locked up in a bathroom before the supporters of the Firangi Memsahib declared her to be the President of the Congress Party.

The outraged students of Darbhanga hurled these questions with ferocity at the ‘Crown Prince’: “What about the condition of Bihari youth in Congress-ruled Maharashtra and even under the Central rule of your party? Why are you involving Gujarat here?” The students also reprimanded Rahul Gandhi by saying: “This meeting is not a platform for making political statements.” If it had been in New Delhi, he could have let loose the goons of the Congress party on the students with the police looking on, to settle immediate political scores. But in the opposition NDA ruled Bihar, Rahul Gandhi could only look on with impotent rage. Left with no alternative, he tried to mollify the irate students by saying that his attacks on Narendra Modi were  “just a slip of the tongue” and that he meant to say “For India to be changed, Bihar needs to be changed first.” Mercifully, the poor but politically savvy voter millions of Bihar have ignored this gratuitous and uncalled for advice and given a thumping majority to the NDA Government headed by Nitish Kumar.

I understand that Rahul Gandhi’s media managers take care to keep away the prying Press from the stage-managed meetings with the students! Why is this so? Why is he so nervous about the Press? I am sure it cannot be because he asks the students to do drug peddling or indulge in any other offences. Why does Rahul Gandhi fear the press so much, particularly when it is closely monitored, controlled, modulated, modified, paid, blackmailed, arm-twisted by the Congress duo of Ahmed Patel and Sonia Gandhi operating from minute-to-minute every day from No: 10 Janpath, New Delhi? Even his Italian Mama’s slavish advisors don’t have much of an opinion regarding his intellect, obviously!

FIRANGI MEMSAHIB SONIA GANDHI ---

INDIA’S INTRACTABLE CANCER

WITHIN AND WITHOUT

V. SUNDARAM I.A.S

         K.S.SUDARSHAN                            SONIA GANDHI       DR.SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY

                                                                                                                            

Kuppahalli Sitaramayya Sudarshan, former RSS Sarsanghachalak has recently come out with a statement on 10th November 2010 blasting Sonia Gandhi for her patently criminal actions which included murders and assassinations. Following are the main points made by him.

1. K.S Sudarshan has called Sonia Gandhi a CIA agent and accused her of plotting assassinations of her husband and former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi and his mother Indira Gandhi.

2. K.S Sudarshan also charged Sonia for delaying medical aid to Indira Gandhi. "Instead of taking her to Ram Manohar Lohia hospital she took her to a medical institute. Why was Rajiv Gandhi's Z plus security was withdrawn when he was on election campaign," former RSS chief asked.

3. K.S Sudarshan has also described Sonia as an illegitimate offspring because she was born in 1946 when her father was in jail. Yet she writes, she was born in 1948 completely overlooking the fact that she was born in 1946.

Sudarshan’s counterattack was made legitimately, fairly, and justly, as a political rejoinder to the totally baseless, juvenile, irresponsible, reprehensible, ignorant and foolish observations of the anointed ‘Crown Prince’ Rahul Gandhi who on 6^th October, 2010 said in Bhopal: “I know only that both SIMI and the RSS are fanatical and hold fundamentalist views.” When it was pointed out to Rahul Gandhi that the SIMI is a proscribed Islamic terror outfit while RSS is not so, that ignoramus paper giant, steeped in petrified feudal adolescence, declared that he did not care about the difference between SIMI a proscribed Islamic terror outfit and the RSS a legitimate social organization claiming fidelity and fealty of over 200 million patriotic Indian citizens!!!

Some time ago the BBC, in an important programme, announced that the RSS is the largest non-governmental organization in the world. If this fact is taken into the notice of the perpetually adolescent, ‘Crown Prince’, I can well imagine what would be his reaction to this piece of information. Perhaps with beaming and boisterous confidence he would exclaim: “The BBC is one of the Saffron terror outfits of the RSS and BJP! We will send our most heroic Home Minister who is fighting Saffron terrorism in India today to England to meet the British Prime Minister and see that the BBC gets suitably reprimanded for their unacceptable offences against the forces of secularism not only in India but through out the world.”  If there is a chance of missing a point in any political debate, you can most definitely be sure that this most extraordinary 40 year old Sonia Congress ‘Youth Icon’ will not be the man to miss it!!!

Moreover, the ‘Crown Prince’ Rahul Gandhi also does not know and does not care to know that it was his great-grand father and India’s first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru who invited the RSS to participate in the 1963 Republic Day parade in recognition of the patriotic services rendered by the RSS during the 1962 China War!!!

New York Times carried a full-page Advertisement placed by an organization called the Forum for Saving Gandhi’s Heritage in the New York Times of October 6, 2007 about the multifaceted glory and grandeur relating to the Himalayan corruption and Himalayan crimes of Sonia Gandhi and her family, including her son the ‘Crown Prince’ Rahul who was detained by the FBI in Boston in 2001 for carrying a large sum of unaccounted cash to the tune of 200,000 U.S Dollars !!. This full-page advertisement highlighted Sonia Gandhi’s,

• Intolerance,
• Deception,
• Self-aggrandisement,
• Violence,
• Corruption and Fraud.

Sonia Gandhi thought that she could silence her Hindu critics in America, notably Narain Kataria and Arish Sahani, by frightening them into submission through a legal notice, followed by legal action and punitive damages. She got the Indian National Overseas Congress to file two libel cases in a New York Court against Narain Kataria and Arish Sahani and the organisation of NRI Hindus in USA, they represented. When the two cases finally came up for hearing, Sonia Gandhi shamelessly absconded from the court. The American Court asked these three questions

1. How is the Indian National Overseas Congress an aggrieved party?
2. Where is Sonia Gandhi, the complainant in this case?
3. Why is Sonia Gandhi absenting herself from this Court?

When no answers were forthcoming from the Indian National Overseas Congress, and when the Court found that the undeclared intention of Sonia Gandhi was to avoid the Court at any cost, the American Court rejected the libel cases of Sonia Gandhi.

I have carefully gone through the detailed legal analysis done by Kornstein Veisz Wexler & Pollard, LP, New York, the Law Firm that represented Narain Kataria and Arish Sahani in their defence case against Sonia Gandhi. The counter affidavit filed by this Law Firm against Sonia Gandhi was a masterpiece which put Sonia Gandhi to a sullen silence and everlasting shame! The Court thoroughly understood that Sonia Gandhi was not interested in substantive justice. She was just using the Indian National Overseas Congress in America to settle political scores with Hindu activists like Narain Kataria and Arish Sahani. I would like to quote one of the most telling paragraphs from this counter-affidavit prepared by Kornstein Veisz Wexler & Pollard, LP, New York:

“It becomes clear that all of the statements complained of by the Indian National Overseas Congress are non-actionable. This politically motivated libel action by INOC Inc. should be barred at the threshold. THE STATEMENTS AT ISSUE ARE NOT `OF AND CONCERNING' THE PLAINTIFF. As a matter of constitutional law, they were not made with `actual malice'. They are, moreover, either true, free of defamatory meaning, protected opinion or permissible hyperbole. Dismissal, now, at the start of this litigation, is amply justified and absolutely necessary, lest a bad precedent breed more such misguided libel cases. Early dismissal becomes even more essential when one considers the political context of this case. At bottom, this is a case about a U.S. subsidiary of a powerful political party in a large foreign country attempting to use our Courts to silence and intimidate its American critics in America. This is not only unacceptable; it is intolerable. WE AS A PEOPLE HAVE COMPLETELY REJECTED THE NOTION THAT A POLITICAL PARTY CAN `USE THE COURTS TO DESTROY POLITICAL OPPONENTS'. [United States v. Helstoski, 442 U.S. 477, 493 (1979)]'.”

The politically shameless and supremely corrupt Sonia Gandhi and her wholly owned family business, called the Indian National Congress, found to their dismay that the Courts of Law in America cannot be intimidated, blackmailed or purchased like the Courts of Law in India. In India Sonia Gandhi and her clan always believed in using the corrupt and pliable Courts of Law to silence or destroy their political opponents!!!

The Congress Party in India after our Independence, right from the days of Nehru till today, has always believed in using the Police, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), the Intelligence Bureau (IB) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to silence or to blackmail or to intimidate their political critics and opponents. Nehru used the same method unsuccessfully against GURUJI GOLWALKER, the second Sarsanghchalak of the RSS. Going along the same path, Indira Gandhi failed miserably against Jai Prakash Narain. Sonia Gandhi and her political goons in India and America seemed to be under the delusion that they can influence the working of American Courts of Law in the same way in which they are able to manipulate all our Courts of Law, including the Supreme Court of India. In this nefarious attempt they failed miserably.

The intellectual and moral bankruptcy of the Congress Party under the politically shameful leadership of politically shameless Sonia Gandhi has indeed today touched a nadir. How could the Congress Party have been successful in deceiving the general public in India for so long with its bogus secularism, Islamic appeasement and corruption? The answer to this question can be given in the words of Dr. Babu Suseelan: “The Congress Party has failed miserably in defending our borders, Hindus, Hindu culture, or to do anything more than protecting their own narrow political interests. As a party, the Congress has reduced its mind and heart to the level of intellectual and moral bankruptcy, outright dishonesty, corruption, ineptitude, nepotism, and inefficiency. These immoral practices have become the fallback mode of the Congress leaders. In the name of pseudo secularism, Congress moral relativists, atheists, and agnostics want to appease Muslims and want to overturn traditional Hindu culture and moral values. Now the Congress Party headed by the Italian Catholic Sonia is devising new cunning schemes to restrict our liberties. For several years, Hindu organizations around the world had exposed Congress leaders' despicable behavior and corrupt practices. It is about time Indians realize SONIA GANDHI IS A `PLANT' IN INDIA BY EUROPEAN CHRISTIAN POLITICS whose aim is to expand Christianity in India. From Hindu religious beliefs Christianity is not a religion in the true sense but a disguised politics of power. These people will kill, murder and annihilate any existing community to further their fanatical goals”.

Now to come back to Sudarshan’s attack on Sonia Gandhi. Following Sudarshan’s tirade against Sonia Gandhi, there was a war of words between the Congress and Bharatiya Janata Party with the former demanding that the BJP and RSS should condemn the statement if they do not concur with it. BJP distanced itself from Sudarshan's comments and even appeared critical of it.

I understand that two cases have been registered by the police in Rajastan against Sudarshan for his observations against Sonia Gandhi referred to above. Upon oral directions of Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi, the Union Home Ministry, the Congress Bureau of Intimidation (CBI) and the  Enforcement Directorate (ED) are capable of registering cases against the Secretary General of the United Nations, the Prime Minister of China, the British Queen Elizabeth II and what not, with abiding faith, understanding supplication and reverential submission to the Nehru-Gandhi clan, in all the Congress ruled states. I would like to enlighten the Police in Sonia Congress chains by inviting their attention to the FOLLOWING FACTS AGAINST SONIA GANDHI HIGHLIGHTED IN THE WEBSITE OF DR SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY and which have been noticed by thousands of viewers all over the world during the LAST EIGHT YEARS.

I have presented all the relevant and pertinent points relating to the wonderful and exceptionable antecedents of Sonia Gandhi and her family from Dr Subramanian Swamy’s article titled ‘SONIA GANDHI IS THE MODERN ROBERT CLIVE’. (http://www.janataparty.org/soniaisthemodern.html)

1. The bottom line observed in Sonia’s mindset is that Sonia Gandhi can disregard Indian laws with impunity. If cornered or if she becomes vulnerable to prosecution, she can always run back to Italy. In Peru, President Fujimori who all along claimed to be “born Peruvian”, when faced with a corruption charge fled to Japan with his loot and reclaimed his Japanese citizenship. That is Sonia’s bottom line fall-back option too. … Is it not significant that the political career graph of Sonia Gandhi advances concomitantly with a series of assassinations and apparently accidental deaths?

2. How did Sanjay’s plane on June 23, 1980 nosedive to a crash and yet the plane fuselage failed to explode upon impact? There was no fuel! How was that possible since flight register shows full tank before take-off? Why was there no inquiry conducted?

3. Is it not a fact that Indira Gandhi died because of loss of blood from the wounds and not directly due to a bullet impacting her head or heart ? Then is it not strange that Sonia had insisted that the bleeding Indira be driven to Lohia Hospital-- in the opposite direction to AIIMS which had a contingency protocol set up for precisely such an event ? And after reaching Lohia Hospital, did not Sonia change her mind and demand that they all drive to AIIMS thus losing 24 valuable minutes?

4. The same kind of mystery surrounds the sudden deaths of Sonia’s other political roadblocks such as Rajesh Pilot, Jitendra Prasad, and Madhavrao Scindia. Such untimely deaths happened in the dark ages in Italy. Should we allow it to happen in India like dumb cattle going to slaughter?

5. ASSASSINATION OF HER HUSBAND RAJIV.

In 1977, when the Janata Party defeated the Congress at the polls, and formed the government, it widely known and published that Sonia with her two children abandoned Indira Gandhi, and ran to the Italian Embassy in New Delhi and hid there. Rajiv Gandhi was a government servant then[as an Indian Airlines pilot], but he too tagged along and hid in that foreign embassy! Such was her baneful influence on him. Rajiv did snap out Sonia’s influence after 1989, but alas he was assassinated before he could rectify the situation.

Those close to Rajiv knew that he was planning to set things right about Sonia after the 1991 elections. He held her to blame for all the financial scandals that led to his defeat at the 1989 polls. She knew of it too because he had told her on his trip to Soviet Union in February 1991. Ever wonder why Sonia’s closest advisers are those whom Rajiv literally hated? Ambika Soni is one such name. Ever wonder why she has asked the President of India to set aside on a mercy petition the Supreme Court judgment directing that Rajiv Gandhi’s LTTE killers be hanged, when she was not similiarly moved for Satwant Singh who killed Indira Gandhi or even recently for Dhanajoy Chattopadhyaya? The explanation for this special consideration for the LTTE perhaps lies in what Rajiv had told her about their future. May be therefore Sonia feels obliged to the LTTE for the assassination.

… BUT THE MOST SINISTER ASPECT OF SONIA GANDHI’S LINKS IS HER CONNECTION WITH TERRORISTS. …

Besides the Palestinian extremists, the Maino family have had extensive business dealings with Saddam Hussein [see Annexure-18], and surprisingly since 1984 with the LTTE [“the Tamil Tigers”]. Sonia’s mother Paola Predebon Maino, and businessman Ottavio Quattrocchi are the main contacts with the Tigers. The mother used the LTTE for money laundering and Quattrocchi for selling weapons to earn commissions. Sonia’s conduit to the LTTE has been and is through Arjun Singh who uses Bangalore as the nodal point for contact.

There is a string of circumstantial evidence pointing to the prima facie possibility that the Maino family may have contracted with the LTTE to kill Rajiv Gandhi. The family may have assured the LTTE that nothing would happen to them because they would ensure it is blamed on the Sikhs or the evidence so much fudged that no court would convict them[ the LTTE intercepted transcripts show this expectation of the LTTE]. But D.R. Karthikeyan of the CBI who led the SIT investigation got the support of Narasimha Rao, cracked the case, and succeeded in getting the LTTE convicted in the trial court, which conviction was upheld by the Supreme Court in 1999.

Although on the involvement of some members of the Congress Party in the assassination, D.R. Karthikeyan soft peddled it ignoring a number of leads perhaps because he did not want political controversy to put road blocks on his investigation as a whole.

The Justice J. S. Verma Commission, which was set up as the last official act of the Chandrashekhar government before demitting office on June 21, 1991, did find that the Congress leaders had disrupted the security arrangements for the Sriperumbudur meeting where Rajiv Gandhi was finally assassinated. The Commission wanted further probe into it but the Rao government rejected that demand. In the meantime under Sonia’s pressure, the Jain Commission was set up by the Rao government, which tried to muddy the waters and thus exonerate the LTTE. But the trial court judgment convicting the LTTE came earlier than the Commission could conclude, and that sinister effort therefore too failed.

Nowadays, Sonia is quite unabashed in having political alliance with those who like MDMK, PMK, and DMK praise Rajiv Gandhi’s killers. NO INDIAN WIDOW WOULD EVER DO THAT. SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES ARE MANY, AND RAISE A DOUBT. My investigations into Sonia’s involvement in Rajiv’s assassination is therefore necessary. I am also author of a best seller titled ‘Assassination Of Rajiv Gandhi—Unasked Questions and Unanswered Queries’ [published by Konark in 2000] IN WHICH I HAVE GIVEN SOME INDICATIONS OF THIS POSSIBLE CONSPIRACY.

CONCLUSION:

• No action can lie against Sudarshan for having repeated the points made over a decade ago by Dr Subramanian Swamy and published over his well-known political party website janataparty.org. It is been seen every day by thousands of viewers all over the world. If repeating the words of Dr Subramanian Swamy can be viewed as an offence by the Sonia Congress Police then I have no doubt that they would also treat the simple act of viewing of Dr Subramanian Swamy’s website by thousands of innocent viewers as an equal offence, if not more.

• I dare the Sonia Congress police in any part of India to file a defamation suit against the Janata Party President Dr Subramanian Swamy for having published certain well-known truths about Sonia Gandhi and her family on his Party Website.

• I am the ALL INDIA GENERAL SECRETARY(IDEOLOGY) OF THE JANATHA PARTY OF DR SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY. I fully endorse the views of Dr Subramanian Swamy on Sonia Gandhi and her family, which were only reiterated by K. S Sudarshan on the stage in Bhopal on November 10, 2010.

• I assert my Fundamental Right not only to FREEDOM OF SPEECH but more importantly FREEDOM AFTER SPEECH, as a proud Indian with more than 500 centuries of family background in India dating back to the Age of the Vedas and the Upanishads.

• 2G Spectrum Scam of Raja is not the end; not even the beginning of the end, but only the end of the beginning for Sonia.

• Finally, I warn the alien imposter, pretender, usurper Sonia Gandhi that her time of uncontrolled misrule and unprecedented and unchecked colonial loot in India is coming to an ignominious end in the very near future.

Soon after Sudarshan spoke against Sonia Gandhi, Dr Subramanian Swamy came out with a Statement stating that he fully endorses the views expressed by Sudarshan. I am giving below the full text of his Statement. He is the only male politician-statesman in India who does not remain neutral between good and evil, between chastity and prostitution, between Indian Soldiers/Border Guards and Paki-Bangladeshi Islamic infiltrators, between Major Sandeep Unnikrishnan and Afzal Guru, between Mahatma Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi, between national patriots and international traitors, and between the fire-brigade and fire.

Statement of Dr. Subramanian Swamy, President of the Janata Party

“The Congress Party deserves to be condemned for taking to the street and engaging in violent protests against the RSS for the disclosure made regarding Sonia Gandhi’s past by former Sarsangchalak KS Sudarshan. Any party which is committed to democracy, which the Congress Party have proved in the Emergency, it is not, should resort to media rebuttal or court action to counter the disclosure made by Shri Sudarshan. But obviously Sonia Gandhi cannot address a press conference or go to court on this matter.

In 2008, the Congress Party had filed a defamation suit in the New York State Supreme Court seeking equivalent of Rupees five hundred crores as damages from three NRIs based in US, namely, Mr. N. Kataria, Mr. Arish Sahni and Mr. D. Satya for bringing out a fullpage advertisement in the NEW YORK TIMES precisely making the same disclosure which Mr. Sudarshan has made yesterday.

The New York State Supreme Court however dismissed their defamation suit and the Congress Party chose not to appeal to the Federal Supreme Court in Washington. OBVIOUSLY GOING TO COURT WOULD LEAD TO FURTHER DISCLOSURES THAT SONIA GANDHI WOULD BE REQUIRED TO MAKE ON THE WITNESS BOX DURING HER CROSS EXAMINATION.

Hence she has chosen the path of all dictators to engage in violent acts to intimidate her critics. Unfortunately such violent acts against Shri Sudarshan will only boomerang against Sonia Gandhi.”

I have no doubt that Sudarshan made his observations after taking due note of all the facts / statements that are to be found in the website of Dr Subramanian Swamy (http://www.janataparty.org/soniaisthemodern.html) under the title ‘KNOW YOUR SONIA’. THE MURDEROUS CRIMES OF SONIA GANDHI REFERRED TO BY SUDARSHAN HAVE BEEN EXPLAINED IN GREAT DETAIL IN THE WEBSITE OF DR SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY.

QUIT INDIA! QUIT INDIA! SONIA!!

V. SUNDARAM I.A.S

                                        Dr Subramanian Swamy

The time for the final reckoning of Sonia Gandhi and her unimaginably corrupt ways by abusing her authority has arrived. Her acts of Himalayan corruption have been brought to public light in a short and succinct manner, yesterday (Wednesday, 24th November, 2010) by Dr Subramanian Swamy, President of Janata Party and former Union Law and Commerce Minister, in his letter addressed to the Prime Minister. I am presenting below a copy of this historic and explosive letter which speaks for itself.

November 24, 2010.

Dr. Manmohan Singh,

Prime Minister of India,

South Block,

New Delhi.

Dear Prime Minister:

You may by now have realized that the 2G Spectrum scandal is not only bad for the country in the dimension of corruption, but now it emerges that there is a national security dimension too. The RAW, IB, CBI, ED all have enough material which they may have placed before you regarding the dubious aspects of the principal player in this scam.

According to my information two sisters, Anushka and Nadia, of Ms Sonia Gandhi had received sixty percent of the kickbacks in this deal i.e. Rs.18,000 crores each. The frequent travel of Sonia Gandhi and her immediate family to Malaysia, Hongkong, Dubai and parts of Europe including London requires to be probed under the law. What requires your special attention is the mode of the travel, not by commercial airliners, but by jets provided by the corporate sector which itself is illegal under the DGCA Rules. I find that often Ms. Sonia Gandhi and family have traveled to Dubai and then traveled onwards on private jets provided by dubious Arab business interests to Europe. It is not clear on what passport they have traveled. In Dubai they were felicitated by agencies of countries which are hostile to India including that of Pakistan.

You can no more not take a stand when evil is permeating in the country in the form of terrorism, religious conversion and demographic infiltration. The ill-gotten money in billions of dollars equivalent, the money laundering and Participatory Notes have all undermined our national integrity. The time has come for you to take a stand.

I am familiar with the information and data with our intelligent agencies. I also know that you can seek cooperation of other countries especially the United States in pooling information especially from inter Intelligence interaction that take place regularly. I hope therefore you will rise to the need of the hour and take effective steps to set right the sorry state of affairs in the country caused by overtly and covertly resident foreigners. In this connection I would like to meet you at the earliest. My Secretary will be in touch with your Secretariat to fix a time.

Yours sincerely,

(Sd SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY )

The title for this article I have derived from the historic speech of Mahatma Gandhi at Bombay on August 9 1942 when he gave the clarion call of QUIT INDIA to the British in India.

In this context, I cannot help recalling the famous speech of Oliver Cromwell to the Rump Parliament in England on 20 April 1653. In 1653, after learning that Parliament was attempting to stay in session despite an agreement to dissolve, and having failed to come up with a working constitution, Oliver Cromwell’s patience ran out. On 20 April, 1653 he harangued the members of the Rump Parliament. This speech does not survive but has often been paraphrased, for instance in the Book of Days: “You have sat too long for any good you have been doing lately ... Depart, I say; and let us have done with you. In the name of God, Go!”

These very words of Cromwell were used by Lord Amery against Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain in a moment of high drama during the notorious Norway Debate in the House of Commons in May 1940. After a string of military and naval disasters were announced, Lord Amery famously attacked Chamberlain's Government, quoting the above words of Oliver Cromwell. Lord Amery told Chamberlain and the House of Commons:

“You have sat too long here for any good you have been doing. Depart, I say, and let us have done with you. In the name of God, go!”

Lord Amery’s speech had the desired effect. Neville Chamberlain resigned from the Office of the Prime Minister and Sir Winston Churchill succeeded him in that Office on May 10, 1940.

I am constrained to use the same words of Oliver Cromwell and quoted with devastating political effect by Lord Amery against Neville Chamberlain, against the corrupt Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi as well, after reading the above letter sent by Dr Subramanian Swamy to the Prime Minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh.

In one of my recent articles I had written about the nefarious attempts by the Solicitor General of India Gopal Subramaniam to cover up the acts of Himalayan corruption of former Union Telecom Minister A. Raja in the 2G Spectrum affair. I had described the Solicitor General as the Saboteur General of India! I am quoting below my own words in this article where I have referred in outline form to the massive corruption of Sonia Gandhi in this case:

“THREE CHEERS TO THIS ‘MOST HONOURABLE’ SABOTEUR GENERAL OF INDIA and MOST DISHONOURABLE SOLICITOR GENERAL for MOST HONOURABLE UNION MINISTER A. RAJA! THREE CHEERS TO THE FIRANGI MEMSAHIB AND HER ITALIAN FAMILY FOR THEIR FACILITATING/PARTICIPATING ROLE IN THE HIMALAYAN 2 G SPECTRUM Rs. 1,760,000,000,000/-LOOT OF AND THE LOOT CASE AGAINST RAJA!!! THREE CHEERS TO OUR BONELESS AND MOST HONEST PRIME MINISTER FOR CONTINUING TO SUPPORT THE MOST CORRUPT UNION MISTER A. RAJA ON THE IRREFUTABLE COMMAND OF THE FIRANGI MEMSAHIB, THE MOST EXALTED, THE MOST VENERABLE AND THE MOST VENAL MOTHER SUPERIOR—SUPREME COORDINATOR AND FACILITATOR--- OF ALL SCAMS IN THE COLONIAL AND ANTI-NATIONAL UPA II (NON) GOVERNMENT OF INDIA!!!”

The common people of India whose innocent blood is getting sucked every minute every day by the Firangi Memsahib, and her family in Italy, apart from the members of her half-Italian family in India, expect our Prime Minister to initiate action on war-footing to deal with the serious issues relating to terrorism, religious conversion and demographic infiltration by Bangladeshi Muslims. The Prime Minister has to take a bold and heroic stand against the ill gotten money in billions of Dollars equivalent, the money-laundering and Participatory Notes, which are destroying the foundations of Indian polity by undermining our National Security. Considering the point relating to the illegal use of corporate sector private planes by Sonia Gandhi, her sisters, her son and others closely related to her for the sole purpose of suitably parking the looted funds in safe tax havens abroad, the Prime Minister has to suo moto initiate immediate action against Sonia Gandhi, the Chairman of UPA Coordination Committee or more precisely the Chairman of the UPA Corruption Committee, failing which Dr Manmohan Singh will be laying himself open to the legitimate charge of criminal negligence of his constitutional responsibilities as the Prime Minister and Chief Executive of India.

   Catherine de' Medici            Lucrezia Borgia                  Firangi Memsahib

THE MOTHER SUPERIOR OF ALL CORRUPTION IN THE UPA II GOVERNMENT IN NEW DELHI IS THE FIRANGI MEMSAHIB SONIA GANDHI. In her over weening political arrogance and bumptiousness, she reminds us all about Catherine de' Medici (1519 – 1589) (born in Florence, Italy) who later became Queen of France, and Lucrezia Borgia (18 April 1480 – 24 June 1519). Authentic history tells us that both these political women were incorrigible political criminals!!

I am presenting below the excerpts from the website of Janata Party of Dr Subramanian Swamy relating to the shady background and criminal antecedents including Nazi and KGB connections of the Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi who fully deserves to be compared with Catherine de' Medici (1519 – 1589) (born in Florence, Italy) who later became Queen of France, and Lucrezia Borgia (1480 – 1519). Authentic history tells us that both these political women were incorrigible political criminals of the most reprehensible kind!

Dr Subramanian Swamy has given all the facts relating to the shady past and criminal record of the Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi which can make the record of Catherine de' Medici and Lucrezia Borgia pale into insignificance. I am presenting below excerpts from Dr Subramanian Swamy’s website.

I. INTRODUCTION

Patriotic Indians should thank the President of India for having the courage, by citing a legal hitch, to dissuade Ms. Sonia Gandhi from staking her claim to form the government on May 17th this year. She therefore, despite all the contrived media hype, did not, and could not, become the Prime Minister of 1 billion plus people of India.

It can now be said that Bharat Mata has been saved from a monumental, devastating, and permanent injury to her national interest and to the patriotic psyche of Indians.

Therefore, it should be the resolve of every Indian to make any and every effort that can be made in a democracy, to ensure that Ms. Sonia Gandhi is kept permanently out of reckoning for any public office. For those who instinctively understand that imperative, this Note has been written to explain the factual basis for this rational determination, and suggest what patriotic Indians can do now to implement that democratic and patriotic resolution.

My opposition to Ms. Sonia Gandhi is not merely because she is Italian---born, although that by itself is a major issue. In other democratic countries, including in Italy, such an issue [of foreign-born aspiring to be head of government]would not even arise at all because the issue has already been settled by incorporating into law that a person cannot hold the highest public office unless he or she is native born.

In India there is no such law but the President, according my knowledge, has correctly acted on a proviso to Section 5 of the Indian Citizenship Act[1955] which requires the Union Home Ministry to lay down conditions to Indian citizenship acquired by foreigners by registration, condition based on the principle of reciprocity [see annexure 1 & 2]. In Ms Gandhi’s case, such of those conditions that apply to Indians on becoming citizens of Italy, would apply to her.

The President reportedly had communicated to Ms. Gandhi on the afternoon of May 17, 2004, that if she insisted on being invited to form the government, he would want first to clarify, on a reference to the Supreme Court, whether in view of this proviso her appointment as PM could be successfully challenged in the court.

It is fair to assume that this report of the President’s decision is correct, since the President had before him my petition dated May 15, 2004 [see Annexure-3] making just that point--- that Ms. Gandhi’s citizenship is conditional, and in particular she cannot be the PM legally.

The President had also given me an appointment at 12.45 PM on May 17, 2004 to explain my submissions in person, which I did. I also told him that I would challenge such a unconstitutional appointment in the Supreme Court just as I had in 2001 when Ms Jayalalitha was illegally sworn in as Chief Minister by the Tamil Nadu Governor.

In that case, the Supreme Court had after hearing me and many other constitutional luminaries, upheld my contention that mere majority in the House is insufficient for being sworn in to a constitutional office, and that the constitutional appointing authority must ensure that there are no disqualifications as well. Ms. Jayalalitha had therefore to step down because she had been disqualified by her conviction in a trial court in the TANSI corruption case [filed by me as a private complaint]. She was subsequently acquitted by the Madras High Court, and hence became eligible the following year.

I also cited to the President a 1962 Allahabad High Court case which held that this proviso in the Citizenship Act was binding and lawful.

The nation by the stalling of Sonia becoming Prime Minister of India, has thus got an unexpected but temporary reprieve, a reprieve received not only because her citizenship of India by registration is not equal to one by birth even by Indian law, but a reprieve more because of the national security risk that was averted.

To comprehend that risk, we must however first understand who Sonia Gandhi really is and what kind of danger she, her family and her friends in Italy, hold for India’s national security. Very little is known about the Mainos’ murky past, and the little that we are told about Sonia are lies. In other words, Indians do not know who Sonia really is or what she represents [see Annexure-4].

Even for an Indian born citizen, we find it difficult to know a person’s true background, but for a foreign-born it is extremely hard because of the remoteness of the place and the language barrier for most people, in this case---Italian.

This note is thus an aide d’memoir of certain verifiable facts that taken together constitute the danger that Sonia Gandhi represents for the nation. And that is the real Sonia and what she represents.

II THREE LIES

Ms. Sonia Gandhi’s background as publicized by her and her Congress Party is based on three lies in order to hide the ugly reality of her life.

First, her real name is Antonia not Sonia. This was revealed by the Italian Ambassador in New Delhi in a letter dated April 27, 1983 [see Annexure-5] to the Union Home Ministry which letter has not been made public. Antonia is Sonia’s real name as stated in her birth certificate.

Sonia is the name given to her subsequently by her father, Stefano Maino [now deceased]. He had been a prisoner of war in Russia during World War II. Stefano had joined the Nazi army as a volunteer, as many Italian fascists had done. Sonia is a Russian not Italian name. While spending two years in a Russian jail, Sonia’s father had become quite pro-Soviet, especially after the liberating US army in Italy had confiscated all fascists’ properties including his.

Second, Sonia was not born in Orbassano as she claims in her bio data submitted to Parliament on becoming MP, but in Luciana as stated in her birth certificate. She perhaps would like to hide the place of her birth because of her father’s connection with the Nazis and Mussolini’s Fascists, and her family’s continuing connections with the Nazi-Fascists underground that is still surviving in Italy since the end of the War. Luciana is where Nazi-Fascist network is headquartered, and is on the Italian-Swiss border. There can be no other explanation for this otherwise meaningless lie.

Third, Sonia Gandhi has not studied beyond High School. But she has falsely claimed in her sworn affidavit [see Annexure-6] filed as a contesting candidate before the Rae Bareli Returning Officer in the 2004 Lok Sabha elections, that she qualified and got a diploma in English from the prestigious University of Cambridge, UK.

Earlier, in 1999 in her biographical data given under her signature to the Lok Sabha Secretariat and which was published in Parliament’s Who’s Who, she had made the same false claim [see Annexure-7].

But later she wrote to the Lok Sabha Speaker, after I had pointed it out to him in a written complaint of a Breach of Ethics of the Lok Sabha, that it was a “typing mistake”. This qualifies her for inclusion thus in the the Guinness Book of World Records as the longest typing mistake in history.

The truth is that Ms. Gandhi has never studied in any college anywhere. She did go to a Catholic nun--run seminary school called Maria Ausiliatrice in Giaveno [15 kms from her adopted home town of Orbassabo]. Poverty those days had forced young Italian girls to go to such missionaries and then in their teens go to UK to get jobs as cleaning maids, waitresses and au pair. The Mainos were poor those days. Sonia’s father was a mason and mother a share cropper [now the family is worth at least $ 2 billion: (see Annexure-10)].

Sonia thus went to the town of Cambridge UK and first learnt some English in a teaching shop called Lennox School [which has since 1990 been wound up]. That is her “education”--- enough English language to get domestic help jobs.

But since in Indian society, education is socially highly valued, thus to fool the Indian public, Sonia Gandhi wilfully lied about her qualifications in Parliamentary records [which is a Breach of Ethics Rules] and in a sworn affidavit [which is criminal offence under IPC, severe enough to disqualify her from being MP]. This also violated the spirit of the Supreme Court judgment requiring candidates to reveal their educational qualification on an affidavit [see Annexure-8].

These three lies indicate that Ms. Sonia Gandhi has something to hide, or has a hidden agenda for India to brazenly fool Indians for some ulterior purpose. We therefore need to find out more about her.

III SONIA'S KGB CONNECTIONS

Such has been the patronage from the beginning extended to Sonia Gandhi and her Italian family from the Soviets. When a Prime Minister of India’s son dates a girl in London, the KGB which valued Indo-Soviet relations, would naturally investigate her. They had, and found out that she was the daughter of Stefano, their old reliable Italian contact. Thus, Sonia married to Rajiv, meant deep access for the Soviets, into the household of the Indian Prime Minister. Hence cementing the Rajiv-Sonia relations was in the Soviet national interest and they went to work on it. And they did, through their moles in the Indira Gandhi camp.

After her marriage to Rajiv, the Soviet connection with the Mainos was fortified and nurtured by generous financial help through commissions and kick-backs on every Indo—Soviet trade deal and defence purchases. According to the respected Swiss magazine, Schweitzer Illustrate [November 1991 issue; see Annexure-10] Rajiv Gandhi had about $2 billion in numbered Swiss bank accounts—which Sonia inherited upon his assassination.

Dr. Yevgenia Albats, Ph.D[Harvard], is a noted Russian scholar and journalist, and was a member of the KGB Commission set up by President Yeltsin in August 1991. She was privy to the Soviet intelligence files that documented these deals and KGB facilitation of the same. In her book—“The State Within a State: The KGB in the Soviet Union”, she even gives the reference numbers of such intelligence files [see Annexure-11] which can now be accessed by any Indian government through a formal request to the Kremlin.

The Russian Government in 1992 was confronted with the Albats’ disclosure by the media. The official spokesperson of the government confirmed the veracity of the disclosure [which was published in Hindu in 1992; see Annexure-12]. The spokesperson defended such financial payments as necessary in “Soviet ideological interest”. Part of the funds were used by the Maino family to fund loyal Congress party candidates in the General Elections [see Annexure-13].

When the Soviet Union disintegrated in 1991, things changed for Ms. Sonia Gandhi. Her patron nation had been disbanded into 16 countries. The rump that became Russia was in a financial mess and disorder. So, Ms. Sonia Gandhi switched and became a supporter of another communist country much to the annoyance of the Russians.

The national security ramification of this ‘annoyance’ is now significant: The President of Russia today is Putin, a former dyed-in-the-wool KGB officer. Upon Dr. Manmohan Singh’s government taking office, Russia called back it’s career diplomat Ambassador in New Delhi and immediately posted in his place, as the new Ambassador, a person who was the KGB station chief in New Delhi during the 1970s.

In view of Dr. Albats revelation, it stands to reason that the new Ambassador would have known first hand about Sonia’s connections with the KGB. He may have in fact been her “controller” and local contact. The new Indian government today which is defacto Sonia’s, cannot afford to annoy him or even disregard Russian demands that come from him. The Sonia coterie will obviously seek to placate him so as not to risk exposure. Is this not a major national security risk for India and a delicate matter for the nation’s sovereignty?

Of course, all Indians would like good normal and healthy relations with Russia. Who can forget their assistance to us in times of need? Today’s Russia is the residual legatee of that Soviet Union which helped India. But just because of that, should we tolerate those in our government set up having clandestine links with a foreign spy agency? In the United States, the government did not tolerate an American spying for Israel even though the two countries are as close as any two countries can be. National security and friendship are as different as chalk and cheese.

In December 2001, I had filed a Writ Petition in the Delhi High Court with the photocopies of the KGB documents, and sought a CBI investigation which the Vajpayee Government was stoutly refusing. Earlier, Minister of State for CBI, Vasundara Raje[now Rajasthan CM], on my letter dated March 3, 2001, had ordered the CBI to investigate. But after Sonia Gandhi and her party stalled the proceedings of Parliament on this issue, the then Prime Minister Vajpayee overruled and cancelled Vasundara’s direction to the CBI.

The Delhi High Court in May 2002 issued a direction to the CBI to ascertain from Russia the truth of my charges. The CBI procrastinated for two years, and finally told the Court that without an FIR registered, the Russians will not entertain any such query. But who stopped the CBI from registering an FIR? The Vajpayee government! And why? Thereby hangs another tale.

IV SONIA'S CONTEMPT FOR LAWS OF INDIA

After Sonia married Rajiv, she and her Italian family aided by friend and Snam Progetti’s New Delhi resident Ottavio Quattrocchi, went about minting money with scant regard for Indian laws and treasures. Within a few years the Mainos rose from utter poverty to become billionaires [see Annexure-14].

There was no area that was left out for the rip-off. On November 19, 1974, as fresh entrant to Parliament, I had asked the then Prime Minister Ms. Indira Gandhi on the floor of the House if her daughter-in-law, Sonia Gandhi, was acting as an insurance agent of a public sector insurance company[Oriental Fire&Insurance], giving the Prime Minister’s official residence as her business address, and using undue influence to get insured the officers of the PMO, while remaining as an Italian citizen[thus violating FERA]. There was an uproar in Parliament, but Mrs. Indira Gandhi had no alternative but to cut her losses. She made a rare admission in a written reply a few days later that it indeed was so, and that it was by mistake, but that Sonia had resigned from her insurance agency[after my question]. But Sonia was incorrigible. Her contempt for Indian law continued to manifest.

The Supreme Court Justice A.C. Gupta Commission set up by the Janata Party government in 1977 came out with a voluminous report on the Maruti Company then owned by the Gandhi family, and has listed eight violations of FERA, Companies Act, and Foreigners Registration Act by Sonia Gandhi. She was never prosecuted, but can still be prosecuted because under Indian law, economic crimes are not subject to the statute of limitation.

In January 1980, Indira Gandhi returned as Prime Minister. The first thing Sonia did was to enroll herself as a voter. This was a gross violation of the law, enough to cause cancellation of her visa [since she was admittedly an Italian citizen then]. There was some hullabaloo in the press about it, so the Delhi Chief Electoral Officer got her name deleted in 1982. But in January 1983, she again enrolled herself as a voter even while as a foreigner [she first applied for citizenship in April 1983] (see Annexure-15).

More recently, A.G. Noorani is his book: Citizen’s Rights, Judges, and State Accountability records [page 318] that Ms. Sonia Gandhi had made available to a foreign national the secret papers of Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru obviously illegally in her possession, and comments as follows:

“Sonia Gandhi has no right to hold them in her possession at all, let alone decide whom to accord permission for access to them”

Such is her revealed disdain for Indian laws and that is her mindset even today. She suffers from a neo-imperialist mentality.

For more details about the glory and grandeur of the Firangi Memsahib Sonia Gandhi see : (http://www.janataparty.org/sonia.html)

CONCLUSION

The exploited and poor people of Bihar have already given the following clarion call to the country as a whole.

SONIA CONGRESS HATAO! DESH KO BACHAO!!

FIRANGI DAKAIT STREE KO BHAGAO! DESH KO BACHAO!!

Let us chase away the foreign female dacoit!

Let us Redeem and Reclaim our country!!