Government of India’s Muslim Police Proposal for Revival of Suhrawardy’s Direct Action Plan of 1946!

V.SUNDARAM   I.A.S

I was shocked to read the above news item in the May 10, 2010 issue of The Telegraph of Calcutta.

I understand that the Islam-embracing, Islam-promoting, Islam-fostering, Christianity-coveting, Hindu-hating and Hindu-baiting Sonia Congress UPA II Government of India has issued instructions to the States and Union territories to post more Muslim policemen in areas with large minority populations so that the force acts more “impartially”, especially in tense and violent situations. This Islamic-terrorism promoting Directive is part of a larger plan to have more Muslims in the administrative machinery at large, and to “sensitise” all government cadres to communal issues right from the training stage onwards. The states have been asked by the Department of Personnel and Training to update it every three months on the progress made in recruiting Muslims in their police forces, where the community is poorly represented.

Covert-Jihadis like Asghar Ali Engineer and others have been arguing that having more Muslims in the police would lead to better management of communal violence and post-riot situations.

But the counter-argument has been that having more Muslim policemen or policewomen does not necessarily lead to communal peace. The government, however, is determined to make the police forces more representative in the jihadi Islamic sense and not in the truly patriotic and nationalistic sense.

A patently pseudo-secular and anti-Hindu training programme module meant for “sensitising” civil servants, prepared by the Lal Bahadur Shastri National Academy of Administration (under informal instructions from firangi Memsahib Sonia’s Congress Party) has been incorporated in the training for the I.A.S, I.F.S, I.P.S and Central Services’ Officers.

A truly jihadi Muslim official in the Union Home Ministry moulded in the line of known Islamic marauders of the past has the temerity to declare that the low numbers of Muslims in the country’s police forces has led to an “institutional communalism” of sorts. He has no comments to make on the expulsion of all the Kashmiri Pundits from Kashmir Valley by his jihadi comrades!! He has no scruples about talking against the Hindus (Kaffirs) of India today because he derrives his political inspiration from the written Guidelines issued by the Muslim League of Jinnah in 1945-46! These GUIDELINES were known as Twenty-three Point printed Circular which was secretly distributed among Muslims of India in 1945-46 and was supposed to be used as a ‘Guideline Document' by jihadis for establishing dar-ul-Islam in India.

A copy of this obnoxiously anti-Hindu document which was printed, cyclostyled, and extensively distributed by Jinnah’s Muslim League among the Muslims of India in general and Muslims of Bengal, Bihar and Punjab in particular in 1946. Suhravady, the Premier of Bengal, fully implemented the Twenty-three Point printed Circular when he organized the Direct Action Day in Calcutta on August 16, 1946.

The prelimnary work for the HINDU GENOCIDE in Calcutta City on Direct Action Day on August 16th 1946 was laid on the 27th of July 1946. Mohammad Ali Jinnah gave a call to the Muslims to observe August 16, 1946 as “Direct Action Day”. Jinnah declared: “The Muslims of India wouldn’t rest contented with any thing less than the immediate establishment of independent and fully sovereign State of Pakistan. ... Now the time has come for the Muslim Nation to resort to Direct action. ... We have taken a most historic decision. Never before in the whole life history of the Muslim League did we do anything except by constitutional methods. Today we have said good-bye to constitutional methods. Throughout the painful negotiations the two parties with whom we bargain held a pistol at us — one with power and machine-guns behind it and the other with non-co-operation and the threat to launch mass civil disobedience. The situation must be met. We also have a pistol.’

Thus the wholesale slaughter of Hindus in Calcutta City on the Day of Direct Action on August 16, 1946 was masterminded by H.S Suhravardy, the Premier of Bengal, who acted as per the directives of Jinnah given to the Muslim Leauge on 27th of July 1946. The Government of Bengal remained silent for two days and watched the mass killing of Hindus with a Nero-like impassivity. The British Governor F Burrows, sat like a marble statue in his Chambers, ‘seeing no evil’ and ‘hearing no evil’. Burrows and Suhravardy were acting in criminal collusion. When the Sikhs of Calcutta were provoked to come out into the streets with their flashing swords to give protection to their defenceless and abandoned Hindu brethren, the tide of killings took a different turn. With the Sikhs and the Hindus coming together in self-defence against the Islamic marauders the tide was turned with equal fury against the murderous Muslim bullies. The Governor and the Prime Minister, seeing that the Muslims were now at the receiving end, now felt the ‘supreme call of duty’ and felt constrained to call the Army to quell the riots.

The number of men, women and children slaughtered on the streets of Calcutta City was over 10,000 and the seriously maimed and injured 15,000 and those rendered utterly penniless and homeless 100,000. A British correspondent of Statesman, Kim Khristen, wrote: ‘I have a stomach made strong by the experience of war, but the war was never like this. This is not a riot. It needs a word found in mediaeval history, a fury. Yet ‘fury’ sounds spontaneous and there must have been some deliberation and organisation to see this fury on the way.’ The culpability of Suhravardy in this sordid criminal operation was laid bare by the local Army Commander and the Chief Secretary of the Bengal Government before Lord Wavell, the Viceroy of India, who visited Calcutta in the last week of August 1946.

Direct Action Day in 1946

Hindu Genocide in Calcutta – Effect of Suhrawardy’s Muslim Policing (Past)

Sonia Congress party wants repetition of Suhravardy’s performance. (Present)

Hindus can expect another mass slaughter from Indian Muslims. (Future)

Suhravardy had given clear instructions to his Muslim Police Officers to either remain silent or inactive or if need be join the Jihadi marauders of the Muslim League in the Jihad of Hindu Genocide. All the Muslim Police Officers joined the Muslim Leauge in the slaughter of the Hindus on Direct Action Day on August 16th 1946.

The distinguished bureaucrat B.K Nehru I.C.S (1909-2001) had a great deal to say about the genocidal activities of Muslim League in those days. In His memoirs Nice Guys Finish Second, published in 1997 he said:

“This massacre of Hindus and Sikhs by Muslims was well organized and directed personally by H.S. Suhrawardy, the then Muslim League Prime Minster of Bengal, and continued for two full days till the Sikh taxi drivers of Calcutta retaliated and their began a counter massacre of the Muslims. It was this alone which led to the machinery of law and order bringing the Holocaust to an end.”

The anti-Hindu and pro-Muslim Sonia Congress Party of the Italian firangi Memsahib and her Congress UPA II Government today are hell bent on increasing the number of Muslim Police Officers in India today just in order to improve upon or at any rate to repeat in the Islamic strife-ridden India of today the same grand Islamic performance of HINDU GENOCIDE let loose by Suhravardy on August 16th 1946.

HUSEYN SHAHEED SUHRAWARDY (1892-1963)

(Political, religious and spiritual precursor of Sonia Congress UPA II Government and Dr.Manmohan Singh and his Islamist Judicial cohorts!!)

Justice Rajinder Sachar Dr Manmohan Singh Justice Ranganath Mishra

(More truly Islamic and Hindu-hating Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardys of today!!!)

(Strongly United in their Pro-Islamic Anti-Hindu ideology!!)

Justice Gopal Das Khosla I.C.S (a former Chief Justice of Punjab) in his seminal research paper titled STERN RECKONING has fully reproduced the lurid instructions issued by the Muslim League of Jinnah to the Muslim marauders in the Twenty-three Point printed Circular to kill and plunder Hindus and dishonour their womenfolk. The blood curdling exhortations made in the aforementioned secret circular became fully known to the police only during the extensive rioting and murderous campaigns organized by the Muslim League in the Punjab and N.W.F.P after June 3, 1947.

The terrorist Muslims of the Muslim League of Jinnah had made elaborate plans for acquiring and storing weapons for attacking Hindus and Sikhs, looting their shops and factories, mounting attacks on temples and even for kidnapping, raping and converting hapless Hindu women, on the eve of Indian Independence, is evident from the contents of the Twenty-three Point printed circular which was secretly distributed among Muslims of India and was supposed to be used as a ‘GUIDELINE DOCUMENT’ by jihadis. Its lurid contents are reproduced hereunder: "

1. All Muslims of India should die for Pakistan.

2. With Pakistan established whole of India should be conquered.

3. All people of India should be converted to Islam.

4. All Muslim Kingdoms should join hands to fight with the Anglo-American exploitation of the whole world.

5. One Muslim should get the right of five Hindus, i.e., each Muslim is equal to five Hindus.

6. All Factories and shops owned by Hindus should be burnt, destroyed, looted and loot should be given to League office.

7. All Muslim Leaguers should carry weapons in defiance of order.

8. All nationalist Muslims if they do not join League should be killed by secret Gestapo.

9. Hindus should be murdered gradually and their population should be reduced.

10. All temples should be destroyed.

11. Muslim League spies in every village and district of India.

12. Congress Leaders should be murdered, one in one month by secret method.

13. Congress upper offices should be destroyed by secret Muslim Gestapo, single person doing the job.

14. Karachi, Bombay, Calcutta, Madras, Goa, Vizagapatnam should be paralysed by December 1946 by Muslim League volunteers.

15. MUSLIMS SHOULD NEVER BE ALLOWED TO WORK UNDER HINDUS IN ARMY, NAVY, GOVERNMENT SERVICES OR PRIVATE FIRMS.

16. Muslims should sabotage whole of India and Congress Government for the final invasion of India by Muslims.

17. Financial resources are given by Muslim League. Invasion of India by Nizam communist, few Europeans, Khoja by Bhopal, few Angl-Indians, few Parsis, few Christians, Punjab, Sid and Bengal will be places of manufacture of all arms, weapons for Muslim Leaguers invasion and establishing a Muslim Empire in India.

18. All arms, weapons should be distributed to Bombay, Calcutta, Delhi, Madras, Banglore, Lahore, Karachi, branches of Muslim League.

19. All sections of Muslim League should carry minimum equipment of weapons, at least pocket knife at all times to destroy Hindus and drive all Hindus out of India.

20. All transport should be used for battle against Hindus.

21. HINDU WOMEN AND GIRLS SHOULD BE RAPED, KIDNAPPED AND CONVERTED INTO MUSLIMS FROM OCTOBER 18, 1946.

22. Hindu culture should be destroyed.

23. All Leaguers should try to be cruel at all times to Hindus and boycott them socially, economically and in many other ways.

NO MUSLIM SHOULD BUY FROM HINDU DEALERS. All Hindu produced films should be boycotted.

All Muslim Leaguers should obey these 23 instructions and bring into action by September 15, 1946."

This 23 Point Plan outlining the dimensions of the proposed pogrom against the Hindus and Sikhs clearly showed that the Muslim League had drawn up an elaborate plan to wreak vengeance on the Hindus.

All these above facts I have gathered from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat.

Unfortunately the national leadership vested in Gandhi and Nehru (and the Congress Party to which they belonged) in whom the naive and gullible Hindus had reposed immense faith in 1945-46 had neither any plans nor any will to fight back the jihadi onslaught of Islam. As a result India was partitioned and Pakistan was formed as an Islamic state resulting in killing and displacement of millions of Hindus in the worst HINDU GENOCIDE ever.

This Twenty-three Point printed Circular can be viewed as a truly Islamic precursor to the Multi Point Muslim Development Programme proposed by Justice Sachar Committee and Justice Ranganath Mishra Committee today. In some respects they are putting even Muslim League and Mohammad Ali Jinnah to shame today by being more vigorously jihadi anti-Hindu and anti-kaffir than even Mohammad Ali Jinnah. Let me prove this point by referring to Point 15 of the Twenty-three Point printed Circular given above which reads as follows:

“15. Muslims should never be allowed to work under Hindus in Army, Navy, Government services or private firms.”

Even where the Muslim League and Mohammad Ali Jinnah did not want the Muslims to ever work under Hindus in Army, Navy, Airforce, Police or Government Services, these two judicial worthies --- nay, indeed jihadis --- Justice Sachar and Justice Ranganath Mishra want a gigantic leap in representation in these services for the Muslims of India!!! These two listless Hindus are greater enemies of Sanatana Dharma and the Hindus of India today than Jinnah or Suhravardy of yesterday or Makhdoom Shah Mahmood Qureshi or Asif Ali Zardari of today.

  DOES NOT THE SACRED OHM

REPRESENT THE HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL ETHOS OF OUR COUNTRY?

V.SUNDARAM I.A.S.

The patently anti-Hindu evangelical Catholic Christian Sonia Congress UPA II Government has its own priorities for the aam aadmi of India. Endless and relentless skyrocketing of the prices of essential commodities, complete breakdown of law and order, infiltration of ISI agents from Pakistan, large scale infiltration of more than 30 Million Bangladeshi Muslims into different parts of India (completely organized by Indira Gandhi and her Congress Government through a criminal and treasonable The Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunal ) (IMDT) Act of 1983) posing a definite threat to internal security and our very national survival ARE NOT VITAL NATIONAL ISSUES TO EITHER Sonia Gandhi or Dr.Manmohan Singh.

Likewise planned neglect of defence acquisitions, complete indifference bordering on contempt towards the service conditions and welfare of serving and retired defence personnel belonging to the armed forces causing many of them even to return their gallantry awards to the President, uncontrolled and uncontrollable Maoist violence in many parts of India, overweeningly stinking corruption in public administration with the office of the Prime Minister serving as the omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent beacon-head and with carefully laid underground conduit pipes to No: 10, Janpath, with its VIP occupants having links to unknown and unknowable sources of Christian funds from abroad --- THESE AND OTHER PRESSING CRITICAL AND NATIONAL PROBLEMS ARE OF NO CONCERN TO THE IRRESPONSIBLE, SHAMELESS AND DEFIANTLY CORRUPT PETTICOAT GOVERNMENT OF Dr Manmohan Singh.

In short, the banana republic of India has become a global symbol for Himalayan corruption, Himalayan fraud, Himalayan terrorism, Himalayan immorality and Himalayan savagery. The two shining symbols of this national treachery on the one hand and international knavery on the other are the super de facto Prime Minister Sonia Gandhi and the supine de jure Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh. My way of joking is to tell the truth about Dr Manmohan Singh and Sonia Gandhi and her creeping and crawling two-legged insects like Pranab Mukherjees, Antonys, Chidambarams and others of their invertebrate ilk.

The most TROUBLING AND SHOCKING CURRENT AND RECENT NEWS ITEM relates to the recent announcement of the Reserve Bank of India to this effect: The Indian rupee will soon join the elite club of major currencies like the dollar, euro, pound sterling and yen to have a unique identification symbol. The Union Cabinet will soon decide on the matter of approving a symbol reflecting the Hindi alphabet standing for 'R'.

The murky background (like the Spectrum Fraud of Dalit Union Minister Raja) to this UPA II Currency Revolution is as follows:

In order to Evangelize and Islamize India by using the subterfuge of the non-existent public need for the modernization of the Face of the Indian Rupee, the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance appointed a Committee of seven members with Smt.Usha Thorat, Deputy Governor of RBI Mumbai as Chairman in 2009 to invite public entries containing proposals for the incorporation of New Symbols in the Indian Rupee. This Committee was directed to critically examine all the proposals and then make a suitable recommendation for the final adoption of a suitable design for the Indian Rupee. The composition of the Committee is as follows:

(i) Smt. Usha Thorat, Deputy Governor, RBI, Mumbai-Chairman.

(ii) Shri K.V. Eapen, Joint Secretary, Deptt. of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi.

(iii) Ms. T. Kumar, Joint Secretary, Ministry of Culture, New Delhi.

(iv) Smt. Aditi Mehta, Joint Secretary, Indira Gandhi national Center for Arts New Delhi.

(v)Shri Anil Sinha, Chairperson, Integrated Desgin Services and Industry Programmes & Projects, National Institute of Design, Ahmedabad.

(vi) Professor Hemant Nagdive, Director, JJ School of Arts, Mumbai.

(vii) Shri Bazil Shaikh, Chief General Manager, RBI, Mumbai.

Meetings of this Jury were held on 29/30 September, 2009 in Indira Gandhi National Centre for Arts, New Delhi and on 16th November, 2009 in Reserve Bank of India, New Delhi for evaluation of entries. Out of more than 25,000 entries received by this Committee, only 3331 were eligible entries. Out of these 3331 entries, only five final entries have been short-listed and selected by this jury.

The criteria adopted by the Jury in short-listing the 5 Symbols was that the Symbol should represent the historical and cultural ethos of the country as widely accepted across the Country and that the Symbol has to be in the Indian National Language script or a visual representation. The second stage of selection focused on finer details such as whether the symbol.

(i) is distinct;
(ii) can evoke a ready recall in India as well as internationally;
(iii) is not unduly cluttered, i.e. simplicity;
(iv) has strength of design;
(v) is easy to write and typecast; and
(vi) has integrity, unity of form and compact look

In response to the Government advertisement announcing public competition and calling for submission of Symbols, thousands of entries were received by the Smt.Thorat Committee. I am presenting below, by way of illustration, 46 symbols which were presented to the Committee and which were rejected outright without assigning any reasons

One of the above Symbols centering round English Alpabet R or Hindi Alphabet , could have been considered by the Committee. The Symbol on the extreme right in the third row above from the top could have been considered for selection. But this symbol does not even remotely suggest the Crescent of Islam or the Cross of Christianity. No wonder it was rejected without much ado. The very first of the 5 Symbols approved by the Committee given below can be seen in the last row above (the Symbol second from the right in the last row above). This was placed first by the Committee only because it represents the symbolic combination of the Crescent of Islam and the Cross of Christianity.

I am presenting below the following 5 Symbols approved and short-listed by the Smt.Usha Thorat Committee. The Committee has claimed that the proposal has been prompted by the growing influence of the Indian economy in the global arena and that thea short-listed five symbols for the Indian rupee drawn up the Committee, reflect the Indian ethos and culture. According to the Committee, like the US Dollar ($) and the Japanese Yen (¥), the new Indian Rupee too will soon have a unique sign that will be recognized worldwide.

The 5 short-listed symbols

The symbols above are a mischievously political and lethal combination of the predatory Islamic Crescent and the Christian Cross --- global symbols of barbarous violence of the two alien Abrahamic Faiths during the last 1, 500 years. I would like to raise the following questions in this context:

a) From when did the CHRISTIAN AND THE ISLAMIC CRESCENT become the Shining Symbols of Indian ethos and culture?

b) From the days of Islamic marauders like Mir Kasim who invaded Sind in 712 AD?

c) From the days of Mohammed of Ghazni who raped north western India and destroyed the Somnath temple in the 1st quarter of the 11th century between 1009 AD and 1025 AD?

d) From the days of Mohammed Ghori who raided and ransacked north-western India in the last 2 decades of the 12th century?

e) From the days of Portuguese Inquisition of Goa initiated by St.Francis Xavier in 1540 AD?

f) What explains the unrequited ‘carnal’ (of the flesh, nothing but the flesh and fleshy!?) infatuation of Sonia Congress Party for the Islamic and Christian Symbol alone as the Shining Symbols of Indian ethos and culture?

g) Why should the closed Abrahamic mind or mindlessness of Sonia Congress UPA II Government be deliberately oblivious of or mischievously indifferent towards the ancient and shinning symbol OHM (the symbol can be seen at the top of the article) as wholly representative of Indian ethos and culture?

h) If Sonia Gandhi from Ottavio Quattrocchi ‘s Italy or Ottavio Quattrocchi from Sonia Gandhi’s Italy can be viewed as true representatives of Indian ethos and culture, then why not the sacred Hindu Symbol of OHM (the symol can be seen at the top of the article) be treated on the same cultural footing by the Evangelical, Pan-Islamic and anti-Hindu Sonia Congress UPA II Government?

The final answers to these questions have to be provided by the people of India uniting and acting together to throw out the Sonia Congress Party and its Islamic terrorist friends in India and the Middle-east from the soil of India forever.

I am presenting below my analysis of the SYMBOL 1 above on the extreme left to prove my main point that it is a planned political combination of the Islamic Crescent and the Christian Cross. Even a cursory perusal of the Symbol presented below is nothing but a combination of SONIA’S CHRISTIAN CROSS + AHMED PATEL’S CRESCENT!

The Flag of Turkmenistan                               Crescent atop a minaret
One source of inspiration for the RBI?!        Another source of inspiration ?!


I have presented the Flag of Turkmenistan above to argue that the Crescent on this Flag is similar to the Crescent proposed by the Reserve Bank of India Committee in Symbol 1 on the extreme left presented above which I have already referred to as the Ahmed Patel CRESCENT. Was the Reserve Bank of India inspired or influenced by the Crescent in the Flag of Turkmenistan? (!)


The Italian Tsarina Sonia Gandhi, the Chairman of the UPA Co-ordination Committee (with the self-declared official status of a Union Cabinet Minister and self-demonstrated and established draconian status of a super de facto Prime Minister) in league with Ahmed Patel, the pan-Islamic and virulently anti-Hindu Muslim Rasputin from Gujarat, has drawn up the above symbol as a potent political instrument of minority vote-bank politics. Women like Sonia Maino and men like Ahmed Patel are dubitable nationalists and indubitably treacherous internationalists!! The lethal forces of global Christianity and global Islam have come together with the full political and official support of Sonia Congress UPA II Government to destroy Hinduism and Sanatana Dharma forever on the sacred soil of India.


Drawing their audacious inspiration from the toxic Nehruvian ideology of venomous anti-Hindu pseudo-secularism, Sonia Gandhi and Ahmed Patel have conspired together to imperiously impose their respective monotheistic religious symbols upon the official currency of our sacred motherland. Their virulent hatred towards Hinduism and Sanatana Dharma is well-known. After all did not Sonia Gandhi dub the RSS as a communal rightist organization?

WHY CANNOT THE ANTI-NATIONAL AND ANTI-HINDU SONIA CONGRESS UPA II GOVERNMENT INCORPORATE THE SACRED TIME-HONOURED SYMBOL

UPON THE PROPOSED MOTIF 1 ABOVE ON EXTREME LEFT? Now by superimposing the alien religious symbols upon our currency, the UPA II Goveernment is clearly giving the political message of their total contempt for their unthinking Hindus and Hindu voters of India. They are cleverly communicating to their Muslim and Christian supporters that they are the only genuine natural citizens of India. At the same time the Government is also giving an irrevocable message to the effect that the Hindus (the Hindu majority demography not withstanding) are only the refugees of India! Taking hourly instructions from Sonia Gandhi, the sole political representative of the Pope in India, the openly pro-Islamic and pro-Christian UPA II Government is giving a daily deathly message to the Hindus of India to this effect---the Government of India would leave no stone unturned to marginalise the Hindus and subject them to daily doses of cultural and civilizational humiliations and ignominy. Hindus of India hereafter would count only for purposes of CASTE BASED CENSUS.

If the 5 Approved Symbols(different combinations of the Islamic Crescent and the Christian Cross) for the Indian rupee drawn up the Finance Ministry displayed above, reflect the Indian ethos and culture, then by the same token and for the same reason, the incorporation of the sacred OHM (symbol can be seen at the top of the article)time honoured symbol of has to be accepted without the usually contentious and essentially anti-Hindu Sonia’s secular UPA II Government objection and argument.


I have already explained as to how Symbol 1 out of the 5 Approved Symbols presented above is a cleverly managed political marriage between the Islamic Crescent and the Christian Cross. Likewise Symbol 3 out of the 5 Approved Symbols presented above is also a political marriage of the same contraband shady and immoral Sonia Congress variety. This will be clear from the illustrated explanatory notes below.

DIFFERENT TYPES OF CROSSES

Please see the symbol of Cross—second from left-- in the second row above. This Cross has been used in one of the 5 Approved Symbols which I have displayed above. For the sake of simple ease of reference, I am showing below in capsule form the two crosses---the one in one of the 5 Approved Symbols and the other in the second row above (second from left)




   

                            

One of the 5 Approved Symbols  The Cross Symbol in the second row     above
                                                          (Second from left)


EVER SINCE SONIA CONGRESS GOVERNMENT CAME TO POWER IN MAY 2004, IT HAS BEEN WORKING ROUND THE CLOCK TO CONVERT INDIA INTO A WHOLLY ROMAN CATHOLIC CHRISTIAN COUNTRY LIKE ITALY. AFTER THE ISSUE OF TWO RUPEE COINS WITH CHRISTIAN CROSS IN 2005, WE NOW HAVE 5 Re COINS WHICH GLORIFY ONLY CHRISTIAN RELIGION.


The here surreptitiously, there openly, the now contemptuously, defiantly, blatantly, sometimes clandestinely and ever consistently Evangelical anti-Hindu Sonia Congress UPA II Government has given a death blow to the doctrine of SECULARISM enshrined in the Indian Constitution by issuing a 5 Re Coin carrying the image of Saint Alphonsa Muttathupadathu (1910-1946). This has been done with focus on the ensuing elections to the Kerala Legislative Assembly. Please see this Sonia Christian 5 Re coin below. (Please see the image of Saint Alphonsa on the coin on the right below)

Catholic Saint Alphonsa on the ‘Secular’ Indian Rs 5 coin

The cause of Sister Alphonsa began on 2 December 1953 in the Syro-Malabar Catholic Diocese of Palai and she was declared a Servant of God. She was canonized as a saint by Pope Benedict XVI on Sunday, 12 October 2008 AT A CEREMONY AT SAINT PETER'S SQUARE to give moral support and encouragement to the Christians of Kerala who are the foremost in supplying innumerable Europe’s Catholic Monastries and Convents with a steady supply of priests and nuns to keep alive in Europe the commercial empire called the Roman Catholic Church. The process of the artificial human drama (patently non-paganish, non-heathenish and totally Catholic Christian to boot!) of Canonization of Saint Alphonsa Muttathupadathu was inaugurated 25 years earlier on 9 July 1985 when she was declared VENERABLE by Pope John Paul II. The next stage in this drama was the Declaration of her Beatification which was made by Pope John Paul II on 8 February 1986 at Kottayam town in Kerala State.

Saint Alphonsa Muttathupadathu of the Immaculate Conception; (19 August 1910 – 28 July 1946) is a Catholic Saint, the second person of Indian origin to be canonized as a saint by the Roman Catholic Church and the first canonized saint of the Syro-Malabar Catholic Church, an Eastern Catholic Church of the Saint Thomas Christian community.


Alphonsamma, as she was locally known, was born in Syro-Malabar Catholic Diocese of Palai. She had a poor, difficult childhood and experienced early loss and suffering. She joined the Franciscan Clarist Congregation, and through them completed schooling and made her permanent vows in 1936. She taught school for years but was plagued by illness. Alphonsamma passed away on 28 July 1946. Only two dozen people attended her funeral. In her 36-year lifespan, she did not do anything big and very few people knew her too. Not many noticed anything special about her. She is not known to have involved in any acts of charity or philanthropy during her lifetime. However, claims of her divine intervention began almost immediately upon her death, and often involved the children in the convent school where she had taught.


She is the first person to be conferred sainthood from the Kerala Church which traces its origins to St Thomas the Apostle, who was believed to have arrived in Kerala in AD 52. She is also the first Indian woman to become a saint of the Catholic Church.


Kottayam is the Rome of India and Palai its Vatican. The Syro-Malabar Catholic Church is a Major Archiepiscopal Church in full communion with the Catholic Church. It is one of the 22 sui iuris Eastern Catholic Churches in the Catholic Church. It is the largest of the Saint Thomas Christian denominations with more than 3.6 million believers. It is also the second largest Eastern Catholic Church in communion with the Bishop of Rome

Pope Benedict XVI

Pope Benedict XVI made a statement to the effect at the Vatican on September 27, 2006. that St. Thomas who first evangelized Syria and Persia, went only to western India and not to South India. THE IMPORT OF THIS STATEMENT WAS THAT ST. THOMAS NEVER TRAVELLED TO SOUTH INDIA. Knowingly or unknowingly, Pope Benedict XVI had in one stroke challenged the basis of Christianity in India and demolished long-held views of the Church in Palai that St. Thomas landed in Kerala, where he spread the gospel among Hindus. The Pope’s comments rooted in fact sent shock waves among the Syrian Christians of Kerala, who proudly trace their ancestry to upper-caste Namboodiri Brahmins who were evangelised by St. Thomas upon his arrival in 52 AD. The comments went unnoticed until Sathya-Deepam, the official mouthpiece of the Syro-Malabar Church, picked it up. Writing in it, George Nedungat, a member of the Oriental Pontifical Institute of Rome, conveyed the community's anguish and claimed that previous Popes had recognized St. Thomas's work in South India.

Having officially declared on September 27, 2006 that St.Thomas never came to Kerala, Pope Benedict XVI somersaulted from this position and canonized St. Alphonsa Muttathupadathu belonging to the Syro-Malabar Church on Sunday, 12 October 2008.


More than 800 millions of Hindus in majority would like to declare to the Sonia Congress UPA Government II today: “Pray do not play with us; pray do not trifle with us; pray do not toy with us; pray do not belittle us with pseudo-secular impunity; pray remember that our time-honoured self respect is made of such hard stuff that it can stand your continued onslaught on us and would never get diminished by your contempt or hatred or indifference. We shall not weaken or tire. We shall not flag or fail. Neither the sudden attacks of our enemies nor the long drawn out exertions of vigilance will wear us down. Unflinching, unswerving, indomitable, inflexible and irrepressible we shall remain, now and for ever and ever! Sooner than later, we shall drive out Sonia Congress inspired anti-Hindu jihadi and evangelical forces from our sacred Motherland, for ever!!”


I wrote a series of 3 articles between 2007 and 2009 on the nefarious attempts of Sonia Gandhi and her Congress Government to Christianize India and her people. I am representing below those 3 articles that speak for themselves.

I. AN ASSAULT ON  THE SOUL OF A NATION—21-3-2007

I had gone to the Landmark book shop on Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai, on one Monday evening in March 2007. When, I got a new 2 Rupee Coin minted in 2006 as loose change towards the balance that was payable to me, I was shell-shocked to note that on one side of this coin was the usual and familiar Ashokan Lion Capitol in miniature size (! ?) with the constitutionally approved and administratively established inscription of Sathyameva Jayathe (Truth Alone Triumphs) deliberately smudged/omitted with pseudo-secular sinister intentions. On the reverse of the same coin, I could clearly see the inscription of a Christian Cross which had replaced the map of India. I asked myself a highly saffronised and communal question: ARE WE LIVING IN A CATHOLIC COUNTRY LIKE ITALY OR SPAIN OR PORTUGAL WHERE ROMAN CATHOLICISM IS THE RELIGION OF THE STATE AND THE PEOPLE?

I am sure it is a 'Christian Cross' and the calculated motive of the Italian-led Government of India is only to inflict Christianity on India. It is yet another Christian fraud committed, not only on the so-called secularism of the country, but also on the Constitution and the conscience of our people. THE ANTI-HINDU SONIA CONGRESS UPA GOVERNMENT IS USING THE INDIAN COINAGE AS AN ADVERTISEMENT MEDIUM FOR LARGE-SCALE MARKETING OF CHRISTIANITY IN INDIA.

It is indeed outrageous and atrocious that the beautiful and sacred map of India in the previous version of the 2 Rupee coin minted in 2000 has been removed and replaced with this lousy Cross in 2006. I wonder what the opposition political parties are doing about it! How it that it escaped their attention? How are we going to put an end to all this pseudo-secular drama?'

Ever since the UPA government under the dynastic stranglehold of Italian Catholic Sonia Gandhi, with extra-territorial loyalty to the Pope in Rome, came to power in New Delhi in May 2004, it has been following a calculated and damnable policy which I have often described times without number as 'Christianity-Coveting, Islam-embracing and Hindu-Hating in stance, posture, ideology, philosophy, programme and action.'

I had exposed the anti-national designs of the Government of India on 3 January, 2007. I had observed as follows about the dastardly slant of the Government of India even in the very routine matter of presentation of government of India websites: I was going through the Government of India websites 10 days ago. I had the misfortune of running into a Government of India website relating to e- greetings under four heads: a) Celebrations; b) Heritage; c) Festivals and d) Glimpses of India. I did not find any e-greeting card for any Hindu festival. However, there were 16 cards for Christmas and nine for Eid. I could clearly see the minoritarian impact of Sachar Committee and Dr Manmohan Singh's Minority Appeasement Declaration (MAD) in concerted action even on a government of India website.'

In this context I would like to quote these immortal words of Shri Aurobindo in his last political speech at Uttarpara on 30 May, 1909: “I say it again today, but I put it in another way. I say no longer that nationalism is a creed, a religion, a faith; I say that it is the Sanatan Dharma which for us is nationalism. This Hindu nation was born with the Sanatan Dharma, with it it moves and with it it grows. When the Sanatan Dharma declines, then the nation declines, and if the Sanatan Dharma were capable of perishing, with the Sanatan Dharma it would also perish. The Sanatan Dharma, is indeed Nationalism. This is the message that I have to speak to you'. If India is held together, it is only because of SANATANA DHARMA.”

It is shocking that a Two-rupee coin has been issued with a 'sectarian' or 'religious' motif. This is a pseudo-secular assault on the Nation which vows 'pantha nirapekshataa' --- neutrality as to 'religion.' This is a departure from the practice of issuing commemorative coins to celebrate Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, Indira Gandhi, B R Ambedkar, Rajiv Gandhi, Dhyaneshwar, 1982-Asian Games, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, Subhash Chandra Bose, Sri Aurobindo, Chittaranjan Das, and Chhatrapati Shivaji.

This indeed is unfortunate. Who is behind all this calculated national mischief?
Is it the Congress Party and its pseudo-secular anti-Hindu allies?
Is it Sonia Gandhi and her caucus with its own convoluted conduit pipes?
Is it an over enthusiastic Christian bureaucrat dreaming of a Padma award or some sinecure post after his retirement?
These are the questions that can be asked by every responsible and enlightened citizen in India today.

Louis the Pious (778 - 840)

In my view, the 2 Rupee Coin issued in 2006 bearing the 'Christian Cross' resembles the Gold Coin issued by Louis the Pious (778 AD-840 AD), also known as Louis I, Louis the Fair, and Louis the Debonaire. He was a Catholic Emperor and King of France from 814 to his death in 840. HE ISSUED A COIN BEARING A CHRISTIAN CROSS WHICH HAS BEEN COPIED SHAMELESSLY BY THE INDIAN GOVERNMENT MINT MASTER WHO HAS INCLUDED THE SAME CROSS ON ONE SIDE OF THE NEW 2 RUPEE COIN ISSUED IN 2006. I am presenting below the picture of that coin issued by Louis the Pious (778-840).

Coin issued by Louis the Pious

  (778 - 840)

Please see the CROSS on the above coin on the left. There are four dots in all in the above coin, two on either side of the vertical line of the Cross. During the days of the Crusades and the Byzantine Empire, they were known a Besant or Besants. Besant was also called solidus, a gold coin of the Roman empire used in Europe until the 15th century. Four dots (besants) on the cross of Louis the Pious (9th century) later evolved into the 'Jerusalem Cross' which was used as a coat of arms for the Latin kingdom in Jerusalem. It was also called 'Crusader's Cross' during the Crusades. The four small dots (later small crosses) are symbolic of the four Gospels proclaimed to the four corners of the earth, beginning in Jerusalem; the large cross symbolizes the person of Christ.

(http://christianity.about.com/cs/artgallery/p/jerusalemcross.htm)

Four canonical gospels are attributed to the Four Evangelists: (Gospel of Matthew, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Luke and Gospel of John). 'Go into the whole world and proclaim the Gospel to every creature. He who believes and is baptised will be saved; he who does not believe will be condemned' (Mk 16:15-16). The Gospel of Mark is cited as the doctrine for Dominus Jesus initiated by Ratzinger, the present Pope in the Vatican.
(http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20000806_dominus-iesus_en.html)

There is a good possibility that this initiative was the inspiration for the Bharatiya Mint Master to produce the plagiarised masterpiece of Crusader's Cross on the 2 Rupee Coin issued by Government of India in 2006 and also for deleting the Hindu Vedic words of wisdom “Satyameva Jayate” from the Indian State Emblem on the obverse of the coin.

I am presenting below two sides of the 2 Rupee Coins issued in 2000 and 2006.

Please note the Indian Two Rupee Coin above bearing the Christian Cross in the coin issued in 2006 (Please see the coin on the left in the bottom row above).

FIRST ROW ABOVE (Coin minted in 2000): Obverse and reverse sides of the Indian coin (Rs 2) minted in 2000. Please see the map of India on the right. Please see the inscription of Satyamevajayate below the Lion Capitol on the left coin.

SECOND ROW ABOVE (Coin minted in 2006): Obverse and reverse sides of the 2 Rupee Indian coins minted in 2006. The inscription of Satyamevajayate below the Lion Capitol on the coin was cleverly removed in the coin minted in 2006. THE REASON FOR THIS REMOVAL OF SATYAMEVAJAYATE BELOW THE LION CAPITOL IS BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT THE CHRISTIAN CONTROLLERS OF THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA DO NOT BELIEVE IN SATYAM; They believe only in singularly unscrupulous religious conversions of Hindus to Christianity.

IN THE OBVERSE SIDE OF THE 2006 VERSION ABOVE: Note carefully the triumphalist Christian Cross which has replaced the Emblem of the Government of India. THE NATIONAL SYMBOL OF INDIA (THE 3 LIONS FROM THE HOARY ASHOKA CHAKRA) HAS AT LONG LAST BEEN CRUCIFIED! Have we lost our sovereignty to the Roman Pope and her female Viceroy in India?

Ashok T Jaisinghani (ashokjai@sancharnet.in) has asked the following relevant questions which will be fully endorsed by the patriotic Hindus of India numbering over more than 800 millions and in absolute majority:

* How many Hindus have noticed the new two-rupee coins bearing the 'Christian Cross'?

* Is the secular government of India openly using the sign like the Cross on Indian coins to encourage the spread of Christianity in India?

* Is the UPA-led government of Manmohan Singh favouring the Christian community just to keep the Italian Christian Sonia Gandhi in good humour?

* Is Prime Minister Manmohan Singh acting as a mere puppet of Sonia Gandhi who is behaving like a de facto Empress of India?

I have cited the example of Christian Cross to be seen in the coins issued by Louis The Pious (778-840) which has been used by Italian Catholic Government of India on the 2 Rupee Coins issued in 2006. The pseudo-secular anti-Hindu leaders of India of New Delhi can say that the example of Louis The Pious is no longer relevant today in 2007!! To such Hindu-baiting people, I would like to give the following examples / samples of Christian Crosses from a modern website of AmeriYank's Christian Crosses:

In the second row above, the Cross on the extreme right looks almost similar (if we exclude the ornamental ends on the four arms) to the Cross on the 2 Rupee Indian Coin issued in 2006.

Today in India, tragically a Hindu has only one parichaya, only one name by which he is known. He is known as a “communalist”. Islamic ideology, Christian ideology and Communist ideology are being viewed as very humane and very civilized by the Italian Catholic UPA Government of India. These alien ideologies with the full political support of the Government of India have all made such inroads into our polity that a Hindu is being called a communalist in his own land.

II Sonia Cong's blitzkrieg evangelisation through RBI ---23-5-2007

V SUNDARAM

After enacting the lurid Christian drama of deliberately inscribing a Christian Cross on 2 Rupee Coins, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has now widely circulated new 1 Rupee Coins minted in 2005 which leaves no one in any doubt about the organised Grand Evangelization of India Programme of the UPA Government of India. Any one can see that on one side of this new 1 Rupee coin, the symbol of Christian Cross has been clearly inscribed. I am presenting below the two sides of the 1 Rupee Coin minted in 2005. President Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), by no means a communal and saffronised pagan like myself, wrote in the 18th century: “The Christian God is cruel, vindictive, capricious and unjust.” If I can suitably adapt those beautiful words to the Indian context today, the Christian Symbols politically promoted by the UPA government through its ‘guided missile’ coinage programme, are viewed as no less cruel, vindictive, capricious and unjust by more than one billion Hindus (800 millions in majority in India) in the world today.

NEW ONE RUPEE COIN MINTED IN 2005

PLEASE SEE THE SYMBOL OF CHRISTIAN CROSS ON THE RIGHT SIDE COIN

As an illiterate (With no Cambridge University qualification to boot and yet duly sanctified by the anointments by the pliable Supreme Court of India), 'superstitious', 'communal', 'non-secular', 'half-savage', 'uncivilised', 'pagan' and 'heathen' Hindu, I had written an article on 21 March, 2007 under the title 'AN ASSAULT ON THE SOUL OF THE NATION' completely exposing the nefarious and dubious designs of the Catholic-Sonia directed soulless surrogate UPA government of India to Evangelize India in a brazen, brash and brutal manner by inscribing a Christian Cross on 2 Rupee Coins minted in 2005-2006.

IRRELEVANT 'FOSSILS' UNDER UPA SEIGE

I AM CONVINCED THAT HINDUISM AND HINDUS ARE UNDER SIEGE TODAY --- they are besieged by the organised Christianity-Caressing, Islam-Embracing and Hindu-Hating might of the UPA Government. The UPA government is out to belittle them, to insult them, to degrade them, to marginalise them and finally to decimate and destroy them. More than one billion Hindus in India and rest of the world are getting to understand that the surrogate UPA Government of India under an impotent, inefficient, inelegant inept and totally corrupt Prime Minister is functioning as the authorised representative of the Pope in Rome, under the overall Generalissimo of a de jure Roman Catholic Prime Minister from Italy, to convert the whole of India into a Roman Catholic country. The Reserve Bank of India is functioning as one of the willing and lethal instruments of this culturally poisonous process of Evangelization of India.

THEY ARE TOGETHER

I have gathered authentic information to the effect that under specific anti-Hindu directions from the UPA government in New Delhi, many strategically planted officers in the Department of Currency Management in the RBI have been working as effective instruments for advancing the cause of Evangelization of India planned and plotted by Sonia of Sonia Congress Party. One of my friends who retired as an officer at a high level from the Department of Currency Management in the RBI has told me that the Monetary Museum set up by the RBI in Bombay has taken special care to run down Hindu heritage and tradition.

Here are the startling facts about this Monetary Museum furnished to me by that officer:

A. The museum has more coins issued by Muslim invaders after 1000 AD than those issued by native Hindu rulers in different parts of India from the dawn of Indian history.

B. The descriptive texts for most of the numismatic items are based upon the anti-Hindu text book of Romilla Thapar - a Congress Party-sponsored Hindu-hating Communist historian from Jawaharlal Nehru University. She does not know a word of Sanskrit and yet she chooses to comment on the Vedas and the ancient Hindu Literature of India based upon the translations and interpretations of British and European scholars in the 19th century who were only paid agents of British Imperialism. Max Mueller (1823-1900) was one of those agents. Romilla Thapar is his spiritual heir today, acting as the spokesman for the anti-Hindu political agenda of the Congress Party!

C. Many of the RBI Officers in the Department of Currency Management seem to be in unquenchable filial love with Mohammad Ali Jinnah (1876-1948) who created Pakistan. In the RBI Monetary Museum the Partition of India is shown with two walls, with the name of two nations, with Pakistan being shown on a higher wall and India on a lower wall. I view it as an organised act of national disrespect. Perhaps the Islam-embracing UPA Government wanted it that way. No other logical explanation is possible.

D. The Monetary Museum does not make any reference to the coinage of Vedic India i.e. Nishka.

E. The detailed process of making the Punch Marked Coins as recorded by Chanakya in his Arthashastra has been deliberately blacked out in the Monetary Museum.


My friend and editor of BHARATIYA PRAGNA from Hyderabad, Dr T Hanuman Chowdary had sought a clarification from the RBI in regard to the Christian Cross on 2 Rupee Coins which I had highlighted in these columns on 21 March, 2007. I am reproducing below the reply given to Dr Chowdary by U S Paliwal, Chief General Manager on 18 April 2007: 'Please refer to your e-mail letter dated 6 April, 2007 forwarding a copy of the article written by Shri.V Sundaram regarding the design of the new 2 Rupee Coin. In this connection, we reproduce below extracts of the Government of India Gazette Notification dated 23 June, 2005 explaining the design of Rupees 2 Coins:G. The Monetary Museum does not start with the evolution of Indian Coinage but with 'What is Money?', as if this is a sterile and dismal economic matter and not one relating to our glorious cultural heritage.
F. Generally coins issued by the invaders of India have been displayed as shining artifacts of our great heritage and not those issued by the native Hindu rulers from all parts of India.

'The reverse of the coin contains the visuals showing stylized representation of 'Unity in diversity' a defining characteristic of our country. The symbol shall be seen as four heads sharing a common body. It shall be thought of as people from all parts of the country coming together under one banner and identifying with one nation. The visual code helps the user connect with an individual denomination, which makes the process of identification quicker.'


The UPA Government of India under the stranglehold of anti-Hindu Catholic Sonia Gandhi is showing a contemptuous disregard for time-honoured Hindu human freedom, Hindu dignity and Hindu spiritual and political self-determination. Through vicious pseudo-secular ploys, plots, programmes and policies it is working round the clock to control, contain and confine government directed spirituality to Islamic and Christian grooves, indirectly forcing all the Hindus of India into impotent grovellers in their own native home land.


Carefully weighing the political machinations and manoeuvres of Sonia Gandhi to use the fleeting might of the UPA government for imposing the overriding process of enforced Evangelization of India, I cannot help saying that she derives her inspiration from Flavius Valerius Aurelius Constantinus (280-337 AD). He is commonly known as Constantine I, (among Roman Catholics) and Constantine the Great, or Saint Constantine (among Eastern Orthodox Christians). Constantine is best known for being the first Christian Roman Emperor. Constantine is also remembered for convoking the Council of Nicaea in 325, which has been hailed as one of the most important landmark events in the development of the Christian religion. In 324, Constantine announced his decision to transform Byzantium into Nova Roma and on 11 May, 330, he officially proclaimed the city as the new capital of the Roman Empire. The city was renamed Constantinople, The City of Constantine, after Constantine's death in 337. Constantinople was the first Christian city in the world, as no pagan temples or sites were permitted to exist or remain in that city. It remained the capital of the Byzantine Empire --- a citadel of Roman Catholic Christianity --- for over a thousand years, until Ottoman Turks captured the city in 1453 and eventually renamed it Istanbul.


Sonia Gandhi would be delighted to rename New Delhi taking the official help of her eunuch Prime Minion Dr Manmohan Singh, as the INDIAN CONSTANTINOPLE. She would also love to declare her Catholic son, Raol (a.k.a Rahul Gandhi) as the Indian Constantine II, the duly anointed First Catholic Emperor of India. He will be declared as the first Emperor of the Sonia Congress Parliamentary Constitutional Monarchy of India. If the Sonia Congress Party ever succeeds in getting an absolute majority in the Lok Sabha, it would not hesitate to declare Catholism as India’s State Religion to legitimize Sonia’s dynasty.

III Christianization of 10 Rupee Coins

V.SUNDARAM

Long awaited Rs. 10 Coin is now officially in circulation.

The Central Government has issued a new 10 Rupee Coin with a ‘Christian crusader’s cross’ on side of the coin presented on the right above. Though the year 2006 is inscribed on one side of the coin displayed above, yet the fact that has to be noted is that it was only in January 2008, it was reported that such a coin was issued. In 2006, the UPA Government had issued a 2 Rupee Coin with the same Christian Crusader’s Cross on one side. Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi had taken this issue to the pointed attention of the people of Gujarat during his campaign in December 2007 Gujarat Assembly election rallies.

Narendra Modi showing to the people 2 Rupee Coin with Christian Crusader’s Cross in November 2007.


After much popular protest this coin was surreptitiously withdrawn without much ado. I am displaying below the photographs of TWO SIDES of both the 2 Rupee Coin and the 1 Rupee Coin, to illustrate my point.

Some ambiguity                                No ambiguity, whatsoever

about the Christian Cross!                            about the Christian Cross


The Double-Barreled Christian Cross can be seen on 2 Rupee Coin on the left side above. The common and usual market-place Christian Cross can be seen on 1 Rupee Coin on the right side above. Later when there were wide-spread protests, the UPA Government, in the manner of an illicit distiller and dealer in contra-band opium, quietly withdrew those coins from circulation and replaced those coins with the newly designed coins shown below.

Please see the Thumbs Up design of 1 Rupee Coin

Please also see the 2 finger sign on the 2 Rupee Coin on the right above.

What is the difference between the Christian Cross seen on 2 Rupee Coins minted in 2006 and 1 Rupee Coins minted in 2005 which have been displayed above? The Christian Cross put into the 2 Rupee Coins issued in 2006 was a calculated and mischievous pseudo-secular experiment deriving its sanction from Suppressio Veri Suggestio Falsi (suppression of truth and suggestion of falsehood) for which the UPA Government in general and the Congress Party in particular own global monopolistic patents.


Perhaps there was an element or grain of vagueness about it. Such vagueness or ambiguity or ambivalence as existed about the Christian Cross on the 2 Rupee Coins of 2006, was completely removed in respect of the 1 Rupee Coins of 2005. The Christian Cross inscribed on the 1 Rupee Coins of 2005 makes it loud and clear that it is a routine Christian Cross and the main aim of the UPA Government is the enforced Evangelization of India.


This indeed is unfortunate. Who is behind all this calculated national mischief? Is it the Congress Party and its pseudo-secular anti-Hindu allies? Is it Sonia Gandhi and her caucus with its own convoluted conduit pipes? Is it an over enthusiastic Christian bureaucrat dreaming of a Padma Award or some sinecure post of Governor of a State or Diplomatic post abroad after his retirement? These are the questions that can be asked by every responsible and enlightened patriotic citizen heroically fighting against national subversion and national sabotage in India today.


This nefarious process set in motion in 2004 has been taken to the next definitive stage with the recent notification of the Italian UPA-controlled RBI relating to the new 10 Rupee Coins bearing the same Christian Crusader’s Cross which was put on 2 Rupee Coin minted in 2006. Anybody can see that the 2 Rupee Coin minted in 2006 bearing the ‘Christian Crusader’s Cross’ shown above resembles the Gold Coin issued by Louis the Pious (778 AD-840 AD), also known as Louis I, Louis the Fair, and Louis the Debonaire. He was Emperor and King of France from 814 to his death in 840. He issued a coin bearing a Christian Crusader’s Cross which has been copied by the Mint Master who included the same Cross on one side of the new 2 Rupee coin minted in 2006. Now the same Christian Crusader’s Cross has again been minted on one side of the 10 Rupee Coin presented at the top of this article. I am presenting below the photographs of the two sides of the Gold Coin issued by Louis the Pious in 820 AD.

Gold Coin issued by Louis the Pious in 820 AD

Please see the Christian Crusader’s Cross on the Left side of the coin above. The same Crusader’s Cross was minted on one side of the 2 Rupee Coin in 2006 which has also been displayed above. As I have observed earlier, the Government of India used the routine Cross on one side of the 1 Rupee Coin minted in 2005. When there was a massive public outcry against these Christian Coins, the UPA Government quietly withdrew these coins from circulation. After observing a lull period of cultural armistice against the besieged Hindus of India, Sonia led UPA Government has now come out with 10 Rupee Coin bearing the same Christian Crusader’s Cross of Louis the Pious (French Emperor from 814 AD to 840 AD).


Even a casual observer cannot miss noticing the fact that there is usually a planned gestation period of 4 years in the guerrilla cultural assaults on the soul of Bharat Mata launched by the UPA Government!


THE IDEOLOGY OF SONIA CONGRESS GOVERNMENT TODAY IS TO DECIMATE EVERY TRACE OF SANATANA DHARMA ON THE SOIL OF INDIA. This will make it easier and safer for the Christian missionaries to convert the Hindus en masse to Christianity.

Nearly one week after I had completed the above article warning my countrymen that the Sonia Congress UPA II Government is hell-bent on Christianizing and Islamizing all our rupee notes just to capture minority votes (in effect Christian and Muslim votes only!), I am happy to see that the Union Government have at last decided to give their approval to a new Rupee Symbol which steers clear of every controversy—religious or political. I am happy to note that the Government of India have incorporated the Devanagiri letter Ra in the new Symbol which I am presenting below

Symbol for Currency approved by Government of India

D Uday Kumar

The above symbol was proposed by D Uday Kumar an IIT post-graduate who has recently joined the teaching Faculty of Guwahati IIT.